Deconstructive Discourse Analysis: Extending the Methodological Conversation

Abstract

Discourse analysis is increasingly becoming a methodology of preference amongst qualitative researchers. There is a danger, however, of it being viewed as a bounded and uncontested domain of research practice. As discourse analysis is inextricably linked with theoretical issues, it is a dynamic practice that is constantly in a process of revision. In this paper I reflect on some of the conceptualisations undergoing the notion of discourse – conceptualisations that have important implications in terms of how the practice of discourse analysis proceeds. I highlight some of the dualisms that may plague discourse analysis, and offer some solutions to these. Finally, I outline the deconstructive discourse analysis that I utilised in my doctoral work. The purpose of the latter is not to provide a recipe of methodology, but to illustrate how elements of various theorists' work (in this case Foucault, Derrida and Parker) may be profitably drawn together to perform specific discourse analytic work.

The Reverse Side of the Medal: About the 2010 FIFA World Cup and the Beautification of the N2 in Cape Town

“…Especially feminist thinkers (Asante 1980;Brittan and Maynard 1984;Chodorow 1978;Collins 1986;Derrida 1976Derrida , 1978Hooks 1984;Macleod and Durrheim 2002), along with many others, highlighted that a dualistic order is systematically present in all factors of domination. Derrida has also pointed to the use of dichotomies in Western thinking, whereby a concept's meaning is also established through the meanings that are placed upon its 'counterpart' (Derrida 1976(Derrida , 1978Macleod 2002). Hooks (1984) claimed that thinking in a binary manner is typical for all systems of domination in Western society.…”

Qualitative Research In Management And Organisational Studies With Reference To Recent South African Research

“…This debate, which is according to Macleod (2002), related to discourse analysis and progressive or critical politics, involved quite a few prominent local scholars including Van Staden (1998), Painter and Theron (2001), Terre Blanche (1998), and Durrheim (2001).…”

Post Abortion Syndrome is a Clinical Reality: A Critical and Methodological Reflection on the Politics, Biology and Phenomenology of Unwanted Pregnancy and Abortion

“…Elsewhere, however, Macleod has been very critical of positivism as a paradigm and distances herself from it (Macleod, 2002). These criticisms are well founded.…”

“…However, her ideological agenda has clouded her judgment and she resorts to arguments that are unsustainable. Indeed, several of them depend on the kind of positivism that is at odds with the constructivist, post-structuralist, and feminist paradigm with which Macleod (2002Macleod ( , 2006 publicly identifies. As a proponent of a pro-choice approach to unwanted pregnancy and the availability of abortion as an option, Macleod wants to eliminate a term that has been be co-opted by pro-life activists into their system of "anti-abortion rhetoric" (p. 17).…”