2000
DOI: 10.1364/ao.39.006602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconvolution of several versions of a scene perturbed by different defocus blurs: influence of kernel diameters on restoration quality and on robustness to kernel estimation

Abstract: It has been shown many times that using different versions of a scene perturbed with different blurs improved the quality of a restored image compared with using a single blurred image. We focus on large defocus blurs, and we first consider a case in which two different blurring kernels are used. We analyze with numerical simulations the influence of the relative diameter of both kernels on the quality of restoration. We then quantitatively evaluate how the two-kernel approach improves the robustness of restor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A gain in resolution in 2-D can however readily be obtained by acquiring two or more successive images with improved resolution along several directions, which are simply recombined, as already done in 3-D for the Multiple Imaging Axis Microscope [33]. Similarly, one can also take benefit of the several 2-D images, which are different versions of the same sample, perturbed by different blurs to improve the kernel estimation and the deconvolution process [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gain in resolution in 2-D can however readily be obtained by acquiring two or more successive images with improved resolution along several directions, which are simply recombined, as already done in 3-D for the Multiple Imaging Axis Microscope [33]. Similarly, one can also take benefit of the several 2-D images, which are different versions of the same sample, perturbed by different blurs to improve the kernel estimation and the deconvolution process [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goudail et al [24] studied multikernel deconvolution with the aim of quantifying the efficiency and the robustness of such a technique. They adapted a Thikonov regularized deconvolution filter to the multikernel deconvolution problem.…”
Section: M a G E P R O C E S S I N G : M U L T I -K E R N E L D E Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it can be considered that each image of the series is perturbed by an independent noise realization. Goudail et al [24] studied the advantage of the multikernel approach with respect to the robustness to noise in the case of two-kernel deconvolution. Their conclusions highlight the positive effect of noise averaging permitted by this approach: because the algorithm is based on the addition of several processed images (see Eq.…”
Section: M a G E P R O C E S S I N G : M U L T I -K E R N E L D E Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, N) in the first range cell with m = 1. By using the estimationsθ n , we will construct the image by formulas (17) and (22) (in the whole frame) and calculate the functional (7)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Phase Distortionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectrum data include some amplitude and (or) phase distortions of various types very often. The problem of compensating these distortions with the aim of achieving high quality of image restoration is actual, and different techniques were suggested to solve this problem both in radar science [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and in optics [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. It is important to notice that in the Fourier optics, one of the most topical tasks is the problem of simultaneous restoration of the optical response function and of the object image in the presence of some phase distortions related to atmospheric turbulences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%