2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decorating UiO-66-NH2 crystals on recyclable fiber bearing polyamine and amidoxime bifunctional groups via cross-linking method with good stability for highly efficient capture of U(VI) from aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure a, UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 presented an approximate apparent morphology of a sphere with size distributions of 97.5 ± 11.20 and 106.5 ± 16.65 nm, respectively, showing good dispersion. The Bragg diffraction peaks (Figure b) at 7.4, 8.5, and 26.2° of UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 samples correspond to the crystal planes (111), (002), and (006), respectively, which were consistent with the reported and simulated patterns, proving their high purity and crystallinity. For the sake of scientific rigor, the analysis and discussion in this study are based on the following assumptions: the structures of the synthesized UiO66/UiO66-NH 2 are perfect crystals with the unit structure formula of Zr 6 O 4 (OH) 4 (bridging linker) 6 and the solution samples are dilute enough such that the UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 particles have equal contact probability with HSA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As shown in Figure a, UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 presented an approximate apparent morphology of a sphere with size distributions of 97.5 ± 11.20 and 106.5 ± 16.65 nm, respectively, showing good dispersion. The Bragg diffraction peaks (Figure b) at 7.4, 8.5, and 26.2° of UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 samples correspond to the crystal planes (111), (002), and (006), respectively, which were consistent with the reported and simulated patterns, proving their high purity and crystallinity. For the sake of scientific rigor, the analysis and discussion in this study are based on the following assumptions: the structures of the synthesized UiO66/UiO66-NH 2 are perfect crystals with the unit structure formula of Zr 6 O 4 (OH) 4 (bridging linker) 6 and the solution samples are dilute enough such that the UiO66 and UiO66-NH 2 particles have equal contact probability with HSA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Table 4 compared the maximum elimination capacity of U(VI) onto other adsorbents reported in previous studies [ 20 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]. It could be seen that ZIF-67-PU possessed a lower elimination capacity in comparison to other MOF adsorbents, i.e., HAP/ZIF-67 [ 22 ], BZCA-ZIF-8 [ 52 ], Fe 3 O 4 @ZIF-8 [ 53 ], and PAN@ZIF-8 [ 54 ], which can be ascribed to the limited amounts of ZIF-67 nanoparticles on the PU surface, since the functional groups of MOF materials played a dominant role in improving the elimination capacity. Moreover, the surface area also has an important influence on adsorption performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the surface area also has an important influence on adsorption performance. The BET surface area of ZIF-67-PU is only 2.57 m 2 ·g −1 , much lower than that of Fe-ZIF-8-300(PO 4 ) (755.25 m 2 ·g −1 and 1069.42 m 2 ·g −1 ) [ 20 ], HAP/ZIF-67 (945.4 m 2 ·g −1 ) [ 22 ], BZCA-ZIF-8 (220.45 m 2 ·g −1 ) [ 52 ] and so on, which is responsible for its lower adsorption capacity for U(VI). Although ZIF-67-PU is insufficient in its elimination capacity in comparison to other efficient MOF adsorbents, the ZIF-sponge displayed remarkable U(VI) elimination performance compared to other adsorbents such as biochar (2.12 mg∙g −1 ) [ 43 ], silicate/diatomite (31.54 mg∙g −1 ) [ 44 ], sulfonated graphene oxide (45.05 mg∙g −1 ) [ 45 ], ZIF-90 (77.6 mg∙g −1 ) and ZIF-90-SA (85.1 mg∙g −1 ) [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The internal crystal structure of the fiber was analyzed by XRD (Figure 3C). The two wide diffraction peaks concentrated at 17 • and 29.5 • corresponded to the (100) and (110) crystal planes of the hexagonal lattice in PANF [42] (Figure 3C, trace a). PAN A F and PAN A F-FeOOH (Figure 3C, traces b,c) had similar characteristic peaks as PANF, showing that the structure of the fiber was not destroyed after functionalization.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pan a F-feoohmentioning
confidence: 99%