Decorative Sociology: Towards a Critique of the Cultural Turn

Abstract

In this paper we outline a critique of`decorative sociology' as a trend in contemporary sociology where`culture' has eclipsed the`social' and where literary interpretation has marginalized sociological methods. By the term`decorative sociology' we mean a branch of modernist aesthetics which is devoted to a politicized, textual reading of society and culture. Although we acknowledge slippage between the textual and material levels of cultural analysis, notably in the output of the Birmingham School, we propose that the intellectual roots of cultural studies inevitably mean that the textual level is pre-eminent. In emphasizing the aesthetic dimension we seek to challenge the political self-image of decorative sociology as a contribution to political intervention. We argue that while the cultural turn has contributed to revising approaches to the relationships between identity and power, race and class, ideology and representation, it has done so chiefly at an aesthetic level. Following Davies (1993), we submit that the greatest achievement of the cultural turn has been to teach students to`read politically'. The effect of this upon concrete political action is an empirical question. Without wishing to minimize the political importance of cultural studies, our hypothesis is that, what might be called the`aestheticization of life' has not translated fully into the politicization of culture.We argue that an adequate cultural sociology would have to be driven by an empirical research agenda, embrace an historical and comparative framework, and have a genuinely sociological focus, that is, a focus on the changing balance of power in Western capitalism. We reject the attempt to submerge the social in the cultural and outline the development of an alternative, integrated perspective on body, self and society. We conclude by briefly commenting on three sociological contributions to the comparative and historical study of cultural institutions which approximate this research agenda: Norbert Elias, Pierre Bourdieu and Richard Sennett.What features characterize contemporary cultural studies? This question is peculiarly difficult to answer because the geo-political development of cultural studies has not followed a uniform pattern. For example, in the USA the main focus is on media, communications, technoculture and multiculturalism. In Canada, an interest in peripheral cultures and cultural ambiguity is more pronounced together with an older tradition in media studies associated with the work of Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan and the studies in

Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective

“…Criticisms of the cultural turn are beginning to emerge from a number of different disciplines suggesting that its practitioners sometimes fail to construct an empirical body of evidence around the theoretical core (Valentine, 2001) and that work conducted under its auspice is sometimes done at an 'aesthetic' level (Rojek and Turner, 2000) or comprises ''critique for critique's sake'' (Hamnett, 2003, p. 2). At the same time there has been considerable concern expressed about the lack of understanding of quantitative methodologies.…”

The mundane and insignificant, the ordinary and the extraordinary: Understanding Everyday Participation and theories of everyday life

“…This of course did not happen as planned, and rather than for instance, de Certeau's cunning tactician, we have the capitalist fox, primed to appropriate and accumulate the "newest everyday cool" for the accumulation both of corporate economic and cultural capital (see McGuigan (2009). Rojek and Turner (2000) were particularly critical of this turn from the "social" to the "cultural", a phenomenon he termed "decorative sociology". In an effort to move beyond the focus on "spectacular" cultural forms, such a club cultures and Hollywood film, some researchers began to develop new forms of analysis such as the "practice turn" developed more thoroughly by Schatzki, Knorr Cetina, and von Savigny (2003), Warde (2014), and Shove, Pantzar, and Watson (2012).…”

Convergence Culture and the Legacy of Feminist Cultural Studies

“…While critiques of Cultural Studies written in this register have been multiple (e.g. Frank 1997, Rojek and Turner 2000, McGuigan 2006) Internet studies has greatly benefited from maintaining the notion that the sites and communities on which it focuses operate as subcultures. This allows web phenomena to be viewed as both markedly different from the generality of people and their lives, and at the same time discrete and cohesive.…”