2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11184898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling or ‘Decaffing’? The Underlying Conceptualization of Circular Economy in the European Union Monitoring Framework

Abstract: In recent years, the shift to a circular economy (CE) has become an increasingly important component of the European Union’s development strategy. However, no consensus has yet been reached on the depth of the transformation this implies, nor on the most appropriate strategy for its measurement. In 2018, the European Commission presented a monitoring framework to evaluate the progress made in this transition, focused on the priority objectives of the European strategy for the CE. This article aims to discuss t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, as many of the case studies were in their initial phase at the time of data collection, with only a few months or years of trajectory, there is insufficient information on their degree of success in terms of the level of circularity achieved. This issue is further aggravated by the general lack of established metrics and targets [47] to gauge the impact of each CEBM on the different stakeholders. Thirdly, the sample of cases under study does not include any counterfactual case, i.e., a firm that did not adopt a CEBM, which could give further valuable insights on the barriers to circularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, as many of the case studies were in their initial phase at the time of data collection, with only a few months or years of trajectory, there is insufficient information on their degree of success in terms of the level of circularity achieved. This issue is further aggravated by the general lack of established metrics and targets [47] to gauge the impact of each CEBM on the different stakeholders. Thirdly, the sample of cases under study does not include any counterfactual case, i.e., a firm that did not adopt a CEBM, which could give further valuable insights on the barriers to circularity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circular economy is a productive paradigm that emphasizes the regenerative capacity of the ecosystem, minimising the consumption of non-renewable resources, prolonging the useful life of goods, and reusing all materials that enter the economic cycle, to minimize waste and emissions [37,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. According to Vence and Pereira [48] (p. 3), "the specific objective of the circular economy is to reduce the consumption of resources and energy and reduce waste through the perpetual return of resources within the economy.…”
Section: The Circular Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This great diversity of CE concepts can be organized into two major groups [46,50]. On the one hand are those that emphasize the long cycles of materials and molecules, focusing on the optimization of use, full recovery, and continuous reincorporation into the production cycle (what Stahel calls the "Era of D").…”
Section: The Circular Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another question concerning effective policy implementation is related with the unintended conflict amongst legislative instruments [38]. There is not yet, in fact, a consensus about the concept of circular economy [39], related strategies/options/alternatives [40], and methods for it to be properly assessed [41]. The policy dimension is one of the most important factors towards achieving levels of a circular economy [42], as well as, the governance dynamics and the respective adjustments [43].…”
Section: Policies Governance and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%