2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling seasonal and temporal dynamics of macroalgal canopy cover in seagrass beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… spicifera to monitor the ecological progress of the expansion process, understand the environmental preferences at annual and interannual scales and, finally, the epiphytes’ role in La Paz Bay biodiversity. Considering that the SST has been an explanatory variable in the response to its non-native distribution in the Pacific Ocean ( Camacho and Houk 2020 , Chávez-Sánchez et al 2022 , Ward et al 2023 ), as well as the presence of precipitation that favours its distribution in both native Atlantic ( Kilar and McLachlan 1986 ) and non-native Pacific areas ( Camacho and Houk 2020 ), which it is limited by the aridity of La Paz Bay ( Obeso-Nieblas et al 2004 ), however, could be compensated by anthropogenic nutrient inputs in the area and the high capacity of this macroalgae to absorb nutrients ( Dulai et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… spicifera to monitor the ecological progress of the expansion process, understand the environmental preferences at annual and interannual scales and, finally, the epiphytes’ role in La Paz Bay biodiversity. Considering that the SST has been an explanatory variable in the response to its non-native distribution in the Pacific Ocean ( Camacho and Houk 2020 , Chávez-Sánchez et al 2022 , Ward et al 2023 ), as well as the presence of precipitation that favours its distribution in both native Atlantic ( Kilar and McLachlan 1986 ) and non-native Pacific areas ( Camacho and Houk 2020 ), which it is limited by the aridity of La Paz Bay ( Obeso-Nieblas et al 2004 ), however, could be compensated by anthropogenic nutrient inputs in the area and the high capacity of this macroalgae to absorb nutrients ( Dulai et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, rainfall in Jamaica and on the south coast is seasonal; therefore, we likely captured the overall response of SAVs to rainfall irrespective of season, that is, before, after, or during one or more wet and/or dry seasons. Nevertheless, seagrass meadows/beds have been found to be nutrient-limited [76,77], and therefore, moderate increases in nutrients are beneficial [78]; high inputs, however, are detrimental, as it promotes the growth and dominance of competing macroalgae [78,79]. Additionally, although there have been reported declines in seagrass percentage cover during wet seasons, this can be followed by rapid recovery during the following dry season [70].…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Predictors Of Sav Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flushing of land-based nutrients into the sea by heavy rainfall in the wet season may impose stress on seagrasses [6]. The overgrowth of periphyton has long been reported to pose negative impacts on seagrasses [47,48]. La Nafie et al [45] indicated that the seagrass beds of Zostera noltii would decline in response to the joint effects of waves and high nutrient loads, which may decrease the mechanical properties and survival.…”
Section: Differential Response Of Seagrasses To Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%