2019
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreased epileptogenesis in mice lacking the System xc transporter occurs in association with a reduction in AMPA receptor subunit GluA1

Abstract: Summary Objective Although the cystine/glutamate antiporter System xc− (Sxc−) plays a permissive role in glioma‐associated seizures, its contribution to other acquired epilepsies has not been determined. As such, the present study investigates whether and how Sxc− contributes to the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) chemical kindling model of epileptogenesis. Methods Male Sxc− null (sut/sut) mice and their wild‐type littermates were administered PTZ (i.p.) daily for up to 21 days (kindling paradigm). Seizure severity w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may be accounted for by differences in how the Sx c − null was created (natural mutation (Chintala et al, 2005) vs. targeted deletion (Sato et al, 2005)), the mouse strain (C3H/HeSnJ vs. C57BL/6) (Loscher et al, 2017), or by the chemoconvulsants used, as well as their method of administration. Finally, these acute studies are different from previous work by ourselves and others demonstrating that loss of Sx c − signaling in male mice-either via mutation, targeted deletion, or pharmacological block-reduced epileptogenesis (i.e., the process of acquiring epilepsy) in several different electrical and chemoconvulsant models (Leclercq et al, 2019;Sears et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…However, it may be accounted for by differences in how the Sx c − null was created (natural mutation (Chintala et al, 2005) vs. targeted deletion (Sato et al, 2005)), the mouse strain (C3H/HeSnJ vs. C57BL/6) (Loscher et al, 2017), or by the chemoconvulsants used, as well as their method of administration. Finally, these acute studies are different from previous work by ourselves and others demonstrating that loss of Sx c − signaling in male mice-either via mutation, targeted deletion, or pharmacological block-reduced epileptogenesis (i.e., the process of acquiring epilepsy) in several different electrical and chemoconvulsant models (Leclercq et al, 2019;Sears et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Finally, blockade of glutamate receptors eliminated the differences in AD latency between xCT −/− and WT mice, suggesting that the lower levels of tonic glutamate in xCT −/− mice delay AD by slowing the activation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors during anoxia. These results reinforce, extend, and interpret findings of reduced neuronal death after ischaemic challenge in cell culture systems (Hsieh et al, 2017;Jackman et al, 2012;Soria et al, 2014;Thorn et al, 2015) as well as protection from epileptogenesis (De Bundel et al, 2011;Leclercq et al, 2019;Sears et al, 2019), cerebral ischaemia (Hsieh et al, 2017) and spinal cord injury (Sprimont et al, 2021) in vivo when system x c − is absent or inhibited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Both of these findings might seem surprising given the importance of Sx c – to the production of GSH, at least, in vitro , where growth of xCT-deficient cells is dependent on the addition of a reducing agent ( Bannai and Tateishi, 1986 ; Chintala et al, 2005 ; Shih et al, 2006 ; Jackman et al, 2010 ). However, xCT –/– and Slc7a11 sut/sut mice have normal brain GSH levels ( De Bundel et al, 2011 ; Sears et al, 2019 ), at least under basal conditions, suggesting that other cyste(i)ne transporter systems compensate for loss in vivo ( Sosnoski et al, 2020 ). We cannot discount that there might be GSH dysregulation following ischemic stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At weaning, genotyping was performed via PCR analysis of tail genomic DNA samples as described ( Sears et al, 2019 ), after which mice were housed three to five per cage such that at least one mouse of each genotype was represented (pseudo-randomized design). Genotype was reconfirmed via PCR upon sacrifice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%