Decreased interoceptive accuracy following social exclusion

Durlik, Caroline; Tsakiris, Manos

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.020

Cited by 29 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings suggest that IAcc can increase and a change in interoceptive accuracy can occur by either externally-triggered social events, such as social exclusion (Durlik & Tsakiris, 2015) or selfdirected attention such as observation of one's face (Ainley et al, 2012) or, as in the case of the present research, the view of one's own body.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

Can you feel the body that you see? On the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and body image

Zamariola

Cardini

Mian³

et al. 2017

Body Image

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interoception and exteroception for body signals are two different ways of perceiving the self: the first from within, the second from outside. We investigated the relationship between Interoceptive Accuracy (IAcc) and external perception of the body and we tested if seeing the body from an external perspective can affect IAcc. Fifty-two healthy female subjects performed a standard heartbeat perception task to assess the IAcc, before and after the Body Image Revealer (BIR), which is a body perception task designed to assess the different aspects of body-image. The performance of the lower IAcc group in the heartbeat perception task significantly improved after the exteroceptive task. These findings highlight the relations between interoceptive and exteroceptive body-representations, supporting the view that these two kinds of awareness are linked and interact with each other.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

Can you feel the body that you see? On the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and body image

Zamariola

Cardini

Mian³

et al. 2017

Body Image

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In line with this reasoning, research has shown that social rejection in fact leads to a stronger desire to avoid self-awareness or self-focus (for instance, by facing away from a mirror; Twenge, Catanese, & Baumeister, 2003). Research on interoceptive accuracy (i.e., the ability to accurately detect and interpret signals of one's own body)-a concept that has been linked to self-focus (Ainley, Tajadura-Jim enez, Fotopoulou, & Tsakiris, 2012)-further supports this perspective by showing that individuals who experienced social exclusion were less accurate than participants who were socially included (Durlik & Tsakiris, 2015). Similar processes might lead perpetrators to turn their attention away from the self, as the confrontation with their transgressions represents a strong threat to their social identity as moral actors.…”

Section: Empirical Evidence For a Weaker Self-focus Of Perpetratorsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Social exclusion can be understood as a signal that something is wrong with the self, e.g., that one has undesirable traits. Research on interoceptive accuracy (i.e., the ability to accurately detect and interpret signals of one's own body)-a concept that has been linked to self-focus (Ainley, Tajadura-Jim enez, Fotopoulou, & Tsakiris, 2012)-further supports this perspective by showing that individuals who experienced social exclusion were less accurate than participants who were socially included (Durlik & Tsakiris, 2015). In line with this reasoning, research has shown that social rejection in fact leads to a stronger desire to avoid self-awareness or self-focus (for instance, by facing away from a mirror; Twenge, Catanese, & Baumeister, 2003).…”

Section: Empirical Evidence For a Weaker Self-focus Of Perpetratorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self‐focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

Siem

Barth

2019

Euro J Social Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We tested the hypothesis that, following a transgression, victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention. In three studies (total N = 740), we manipulated participants’ social role (victim vs. perpetrator) in a hypothetical scenario (Studies 1 and 2) and in a perceived real conflict (Study 3) in an interpersonal (Studies 1 and 2) and an intergroup (Study 3) context. Results from all studies confirmed that victims show a stronger self‐focus than perpetrators. Moreover, results suggest victims’ higher self‐focus as a predictor of willingness to reconcile. Participants’ self‐focus mediated the effect of social role on reconciliation intentions as a single mediator (Study 2), or in sequence with their motivation to consider the other party's needs (Study 3). Overall, the present research suggests that victims and perpetrators differ in their focus of attention, and that this difference has important theoretical and practical implications for reconciliation between individuals and between groups.

show abstract

“…Mimicry is well-known to be elicited as an automatic behavior in response to social exclusion and to reduce outgroup effects (Lakin et al, 2008). Indeed, the human desire to fit in and be liked can not only alter personalities, but might be so profound as to alter one's own physiological interoceptive function to reflect an interlocutor during conversation (Durlik and Tsakiris, 2015). …”

Section: Illusions Enabled By Virtual Realitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Model of Illusions and Virtual Reality

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Virtual Reality (VR) it is possible to induce illusions in which users report and behave as if they have entered into altered situations and identities. The effect can be robust enough for participants to respond “realistically,” meaning behaviors are altered as if subjects had been exposed to the scenarios in reality. The circumstances in which such VR illusions take place were first introduced in the 80's. Since then, rigorous empirical evidence has explored a wide set of illusory experiences in VR. Here, we compile this research and propose a neuroscientific model explaining the underlying perceptual and cognitive mechanisms that enable illusions in VR. Furthermore, we describe the minimum instrumentation requirements to support illusory experiences in VR, and discuss the importance and shortcomings of the generic model.

show abstract

Decreased interoceptive accuracy following social exclusion

Cited by 29 publications

References 56 publications

Can you feel the body that you see? On the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and body image

Can you feel the body that you see? On the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and body image

(Not) Thinking about you: Differences in victims’ and perpetrators’ self‐focus after interpersonal and intergroup transgressions

Model of Illusions and Virtual Reality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About