“…In the literature, few inception cohorts of early RA had assessed rates of orthopedic and small joint surgery, with conflicting results [ 9 – 14 , 18 , 19 ]; prevalence ranged from 5.3% at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years [ 13 ] to 58% after a mean follow-up of 16 years [ 12 ]; variations may be explained by a lack of a uniform definition of “early disease” [ 9 – 14 , 19 ], a wide spectrum of follow-ups that may last up to 25 years [ 19 ], differences in the genetic background of the populations in whom surgery was assessed (from the UK [ 9 , 11 , 14 ], Sweden [ 12 , 18 ], Canada [ 13 ], the Netherlands [ 10 ] and Finland [ 19 ]) and the year of patient’s inclusion, which may have affected the current standard of care. Our cohort had distinctive characteristics which may additionally explain our low OHSI prevalence, estimated as 2.2% at 5 years and reaching 11.7% at last follow-up (13 years); all of our patients were of Hispanic origin and there is only one study which evaluated 355 major joint surgeries performed in Brazilian patients, although only 8 patients had RA diagnosis, which precludes any comparison [ 20 ]; also, mean symptom’s duration from our patients was close to 5 months, the cohort had a limited follow-up and included patients from 2004 onwards; finally, our patients received a T2T strategy, primarily with combined traditional DMARDs meanwhile only 4 patients had access to biologics. Of note, Moura et al [ 13 ] identified new-onset RA patients in the Québec Health Insurance Program databases from 2002 to 2011, which is close to our cohort initiation date, and described 10.9 joint replacements during 1000 person-years, similar to our finding.…”