Forty normal male volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and instructed to raise and lower their systolic blood pressure. Subjects received either beat-to-beat feedback contingent on pressure changes, noncontingent beat-to-beat feedback, noncontingent feedback presented randomly with respect to the occurrence of each heart beat, or instructions alone. The order of increase and decrease trial blocks was counterbalanced across groups. Subjects receiving contingent feedback were monetarily rewarded for appropriate pressure changes. Subjects receiving noncontingent feedback received rewards and feedback equal to the mean received by the contingent group. Subjects in the instructions-only condition were also paid this bonus but were informed of their earnings only at the conclusion of the experiment. Results indicated that in the presence of instructions, feedback, whether contingent or noncontingent, added little to subjects' ability to control pressure during a single session. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.DESCRIPTORS: systolic blood pressure, biofeedback, visceral learning, behavioral control, instructions, reinforcement, monetary reinforcers, adult males It is well established that human subjects can learn to control either systolic or diastolic blood pressure through the use of feedback and reward for variations in pressure with each beat of the heart (Shapiro, Tursky, Gershon, and Stern, 1969;Shapiro, Tursky, and Schwartz, 1970;Shapiro, Schwartz, and Tursky, 1972). In these experiments, blood pressure is tracked and feedback provided by inflating a cuff to a constant pressure, set to either the systolic or diastolic level for a brief trial interval, and providing a feedback signal at either the presence or absence of Korotkoff (K) shapes systolic blood pressure by raising the cuff pressure between trials (cuff inflations) if K sounds appear on 75 % or more of the heart beats, or lowering the cuff pressure if K sounds appear on 25 % or less of the heart beats in a given trial. The reverse relationship between pressure and K sounds is used to track diastolic pressure.Experiments with this method have normally shown that when subjects are not informed of the specific response or direction of change required of them, noncontingent or random feedback is inferior to contingent feedback in producing blood-pressure changes. This is not surprising, because uninstructed subjects given noncontingent feedback have no information about what they are being asked to do. Characteristically, these subjects show a tendency for blood pressure to decrease over a session (Shapiro et al., 1970).In most clinical applications of blood pressure feedback, however, patients are, often unavoidably, informed of the response to be controlled and the direction of the desired change 625 1977, 103, 625-631 NUMBER 4 (WINTER) 1977