2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijram.2016.074435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreasing information asymmetry by sharing business data: a case of business non-payers sharing agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Explicitly, information asymmetry recurs every time the actors involved in a relationship have different amounts of information about exchanged goods or provided services (Caputo and Evangelista, 2019). As a consequence of this difference in information equipment, actors with more information could adopt speculative behaviours to increase their market power (Krishnaswami and Subramaniam, 1999; Perko and Mlinaric, 2016). More specifically, information asymmetry can influence relationships at two different levels (Mulej et al , 2006): Preventive or ex-ante information asymmetry , in the case in which one party hides information that has a relevant role in defining conditions and results of the transaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicitly, information asymmetry recurs every time the actors involved in a relationship have different amounts of information about exchanged goods or provided services (Caputo and Evangelista, 2019). As a consequence of this difference in information equipment, actors with more information could adopt speculative behaviours to increase their market power (Krishnaswami and Subramaniam, 1999; Perko and Mlinaric, 2016). More specifically, information asymmetry can influence relationships at two different levels (Mulej et al , 2006): Preventive or ex-ante information asymmetry , in the case in which one party hides information that has a relevant role in defining conditions and results of the transaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the feasibility of the sharing potential/opportunities, an experiment was conducted. Multiple companies shared data on invoices defaults, issued to their business partners (Perko and Mlinaric, 2016). During the experiment, the paying strategies from regular payments, trough payment delays, and strategic defaults[1] to terminal non-performing invoices were observed.…”
Section: Defaults Sharing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data sharing is a proven concept. The financial institutions share their customers' data to avoid credit risk (Dierkes et al, 2013;Kanaparti et al, 2012); the sellers in online marketplaces are rated by their customers; in the supply chains, the inventory information is often shared with the suppliers (Sanders et al, 2011); and non-payment patterns are shared between companies (Perko and Mlinaric, 2016). Nevertheless, for a typical company, especially a small and medium enterprise (SME), the effort to manage complex sharing mechanisms is too large to cope with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon this assumption, systems thinking represents the better approach to understanding how all the elements and relationships in society are linked and evolve over the time (Cutcliffe, 2000;Caputo, 2016). The systems thinking approach supports the shift from a reductionist and mechanistic approach direct to explain how elements are composed and related to a holistic and dynamic view in which the attention is also on the elements that affect the emergence and the evolution of the whole phenomenon (Barile et al, 2016;Perko and Mlinari c, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%