Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Specific sources of dietary fibres in sow gestation and lactation diets, such as inulin or wheat bran, have been shown to affect both the sow and its litter health by modulating the piglet’s intestinal microbial population and composition. However, only a few studies have reported the effects of some specific fractions of the cell wall of the plants in the sow’s lactation diet. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of increasing the level of HCs in a sow’s lactation diet on the nutrient apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), the faecal volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile, the microbiota of the sow and the microbiota and the performances of slow-growing (SG) and fast-growing (FG) piglets. Results Increasing HCs level increased ( P < 0.05) the proportions of butyrate and valerate on day 3, and the ATTD of acid detergent fibres (ADF), neutral detergent fibres (NDF), and gross energy and decreased ( P < 0.05) the proportion of propionate on day 17, and the ATTD of crude protein. The beta diversity was affected (r 2 = 0.11; P = 0.02) by the maternal dietary treatments with 11 common genera differing ( P < 0.05) in the sow’s faecal microbiota, and five in the piglet’s microbiota. Regardless of the maternal dietary treatment, SG piglets had a lower ( P < 0.05) proportion of isobutyrate and isovalerate, a lower ( P < 0.05) abundance of Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014 _group , Enterococcus , and Succinovibrio genera, and a greater ( P < 0.05) abundance of Olsenella than FG piglets. Conclusions Increased HCs level in a sow’s lactation diet affects the ATTD of nutrients, the faecal VFA and microbiota profiles of the sows with limited effects on SG and FG piglets’ faecal microbiota and no effects on the performance or VFA profile of these piglets. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-024-00354-z.
Background Specific sources of dietary fibres in sow gestation and lactation diets, such as inulin or wheat bran, have been shown to affect both the sow and its litter health by modulating the piglet’s intestinal microbial population and composition. However, only a few studies have reported the effects of some specific fractions of the cell wall of the plants in the sow’s lactation diet. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of increasing the level of HCs in a sow’s lactation diet on the nutrient apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD), the faecal volatile fatty acid (VFA) profile, the microbiota of the sow and the microbiota and the performances of slow-growing (SG) and fast-growing (FG) piglets. Results Increasing HCs level increased ( P < 0.05) the proportions of butyrate and valerate on day 3, and the ATTD of acid detergent fibres (ADF), neutral detergent fibres (NDF), and gross energy and decreased ( P < 0.05) the proportion of propionate on day 17, and the ATTD of crude protein. The beta diversity was affected (r 2 = 0.11; P = 0.02) by the maternal dietary treatments with 11 common genera differing ( P < 0.05) in the sow’s faecal microbiota, and five in the piglet’s microbiota. Regardless of the maternal dietary treatment, SG piglets had a lower ( P < 0.05) proportion of isobutyrate and isovalerate, a lower ( P < 0.05) abundance of Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014 _group , Enterococcus , and Succinovibrio genera, and a greater ( P < 0.05) abundance of Olsenella than FG piglets. Conclusions Increased HCs level in a sow’s lactation diet affects the ATTD of nutrients, the faecal VFA and microbiota profiles of the sows with limited effects on SG and FG piglets’ faecal microbiota and no effects on the performance or VFA profile of these piglets. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-024-00354-z.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.