2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decrements in vigilance and cognitive functioning associated with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
3
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
57
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also associated with the disease are fatigue and daytime sleepiness,[7,9] reduced work productivity,[10-12] impaired cognitive functioning,[13,14] reduced learning abilities,[15] and impaired sleep[16]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also associated with the disease are fatigue and daytime sleepiness,[7,9] reduced work productivity,[10-12] impaired cognitive functioning,[13,14] reduced learning abilities,[15] and impaired sleep[16]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Consequently, many of the sequelae of AR, such as fatigue, decreased cognitive functioning and work performance, and reduced QOL, may be caused or worsened by AR-related sleep impairment. [14][15][16][17] The importance of ARrelated sleep impairment is acknowledged in both the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) guidelines for the management of AR 18 and in the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines, 2 in which the presence of abnormal sleep is one of the factors that reclassifies the severity of AR from mild to moderate/severe. The achievement of unimpaired sleep, therefore, is a primary goal of AR treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are sizeable effects compared to other changes in education settings often discussed, such as changes in class size or teacher quality. However, they are a bit smaller than effect sizes on memory, problem solving speed and reasoning measured in clinical settings, which range from 0.30 to 0.65 (Wilken et al (2002)). In Table 4, I present results of the Model 1 estimated for two important subgroups of students: black students and economically disadvantaged students, as proxied by FARM eligibility.…”
Section: Multivariate Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Much of this work is based on clinical lab research, comparing subjects with a history of SAR in various settings. For example, Wilken et al (2002) randomly divided subjects with SAR into a group exposed to pollen and a control 5 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_256.pdf group, and found that the exposed subjects scored lower on measures of computation and reasoning ability, and had longer response times and more difficulty with attention. Marshall et al (2000) find similar patterns for subjects with SAR when comparing tests administered during allergy season to those administered when pollen levels were essentially zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%