2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1747-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma of the maxilla: a case report and review of the literature

Abstract: BackgroundParosteal osteosarcomas are usually low-grade tumors, however, sometimes they transform to high-grade tumors, which is named dedifferentiation. This phenomenon has been reported in long bones. Recently, we encountered a patient with dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma occurring in the maxilla. Here, we report a first case of dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma of the head and neck region.Case presentationA 45-year-old Japanese woman with a refractory bone lesion in the maxilla presented to ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case 4 developed into a high‐grade, non‐osteogenic tumor (dedifferentiation) 4 years after the first presentation to our hospital (Figure 4(a) ), and the details of this case have been described previously (Miyashita et al, 2018 ). Case 7 presented with lung metastasis 2 years after the first presentation, in which histology of the metastasis was composed of a mixture of osteochondrogenic (Figure 4(c) ) and non‐osteogenic (Figure 4(d) ) tumors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case 4 developed into a high‐grade, non‐osteogenic tumor (dedifferentiation) 4 years after the first presentation to our hospital (Figure 4(a) ), and the details of this case have been described previously (Miyashita et al, 2018 ). Case 7 presented with lung metastasis 2 years after the first presentation, in which histology of the metastasis was composed of a mixture of osteochondrogenic (Figure 4(c) ) and non‐osteogenic (Figure 4(d) ) tumors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, MDM2 and CDK4 expression were observed on immunostaining in cases 1 (Figure3(a, b)), 4 (Figure3(c,d)), and 7. The histological features of the biopsy specimens are summarized in Tables2 and 3.Case 4 developed into a high-grade, non-osteogenic tumor (dedifferentiation) 4 years after the first presentation to our hospital (Figure4(a)), and the details of this case have been described previously(Miyashita et al, 2018). Case 7 presented with lung metastasis 2 years after the first presentation, in which histology of the metastasis was composed of a mixture of osteochondrogenic (Figure4(c)) and non-osteogenic (Figure 4(d)) tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, because most patients with soft tissue sarcoma were pretreated with other chemotherapies, including anthracyclines, the definite evaluation in soft tissue sarcoma was suspended [15]. Since then, there have been various case reports or case series analysis that indicated preferable outcomes with THP-based combination chemotherapy [16][17][18][19]. Thus, a randomized controlled trial for the usage of THP-based chemotherapy will be needed to gain future approval for soft tissue sarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because most patients with soft tissue sarcoma were pretreated with other chemotherapies, including anthracyclines, the de nite evaluation in soft tissue sarcoma was suspended (14). Since then, there have been various case reports or case series analysis that indicated preferable outcomes with THP-based combination chemotherapy (15,16,17,18). Thus, a randomized controlled trial for the usage of THP-based chemotherapy will be needed to gain future approval for soft tissue sarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%