Deep 1.4-GHz observations of diffuse polarized emission

Abstract

Polarized diffuse emission observations at 1.4-GHz in a high Galactic latitude area of the northern Celestial hemisphere are presented. The 3.2 X 3.2 deg^2 field, centred at RA = 10h 58m, Dec = +42deg 18' (B1950), has Galactic coordinates l~172deg, b~+63deg and is located in the region selected as northern target of the BaR-SPOrt experiment. Observations have been performed with the Effelsberg 100-m telescope. We find that the angular power spectra of the E- and B-modes have slopes of beta_E = -1.79 +/- 0.13 and beta_B = -1.74 +/- 0.12, respectively. Because of the very high Galactic latitude and the smooth emission, a weak Faraday rotation action is expected, which allows both a fair extrapolation to Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization (CMBP) frequencies and an estimate of the contamination by Galactic synchrotron emission. We extrapolate the E-mode spectrum up to 32-GHz and confirm the possibility to safely detect the CMBP E-mode signal in the Ka band found in another low emission region (Carretti et al. 2005b). Extrapolated up to 90-GHz, the Galactic synchrotron B-mode looks to compete with the cosmic signal only for models with a tensor-to-scalar perturbation power ratio T/S < 0.001, which is even lower than the T/S value of 0.01 found to be accessible in the only other high Galactic latitude area investigated to date. This suggests that values as low as T/S = 0.01 might be accessed at high Galactic latitudes. Such low emission values can allow a significant red-shift of the best frequency to detect the CMBP B-mode, also reducing the contamination by Galactic dust, and opening interesting perspectives to investigate Inflation models.Comment: 8 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in MNRA

1.4-GHz polarimetric observations of the two fields imaged by the DASI experiment

“…They find that the Galactic signal should not prevent the detection of the CMB E mode in that area at frequencies ≥30 GHz. A similar analysis has been conducted in another area in the Northern sky providing similar conclusions (Carretti et al 2006). Although these results can be used as indicators of conditions in low‐emission regions, every area has its own specific features and requires dedicated observations, especially if representing a target for CMBP experiments.…”

An angular power spectrum analysis of the DRAO 1.4 GHz polarization survey: implications for CMB observations

“…6 The best-fit results may suggest a polarization degree (obtained considering the contribution of the subtracted DSs, ∼0.05−0.2 mK 2 , to the temperature APS also) considerably higher than ∼2%, the value found for NVSS extragalactic (mainly steep spectrum) sources (Mesa et al 2002;Tucci et al 2004). It may imply a presence (or a combination) of spurious instrumental polarization at small scales, of a significant contribution from highly polarized Galactic sources (Manchester et al 1998) non-subtracted in the maps, or of a flattening of the diffuse synchrotron polarized emission APS at > ∼ 200−250 in higher resolution data on smaller sky areas (Baccigalupi et al 2001;Carretti et al 2006). 7 We used the CMBFAST code (version 4.5.1) for the computation of the CMB APS (http://www.cmbfast.org/).…”

A Measurement of the CMB 〈EE〉 Spectrum from the 2003 Flight of BOOMERANG

“…The other symbols show errors in relative calibration (stars), bolometer time constant (upward-pointing triangles) and polarization angle (downward-pointing triangles). Because errors in absolute calibration and polarization efficiency are multiplicative factors that act identically on each bin, their effect is left off this plot and reported instead in Table 6 1.4 GHz (Bernardi et al 2003) and 2.3 GHz (Carretti et al 2006). A naive extrapolation of these synchrotron results to 145 GHz predicts a signal of 0.2 K rms compared to a $3 K rms expected from the fiducial ÃCDM model given our beam.…”