2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3056558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Analysis of EIT Dataset to Classify Apnea and Non-Apnea Cases in Neonatal Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of a classifier model which is built on limited training images was reported by [28]. Nevertheless, this dataset will be a valuable framework in developing tomographic sensing interpretation using ML [29] [30].…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Using Mutual Induction Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a classifier model which is built on limited training images was reported by [28]. Nevertheless, this dataset will be a valuable framework in developing tomographic sensing interpretation using ML [29] [30].…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Using Mutual Induction Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 A study conducted on 15 premature newborns took data from an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and used it in a hybrid classification model combining convoluted neural networks and SVM, resulting in an accuracy of 71% to 97%. 38 Another study collected data from 229 neonates who had apnea, with 23 features and processed it using decision trees and SVM. For the SVM-based model, a radial kernel was chosen with 10-fold cross-validation.…”
Section: Apneamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LR is based on the statistical model that employs the logistic function to learn the data. Following the efficacy of traditional machine learning methods, Hansen et al(26) employed the hidden Markov Model (HMM) coupling with the higher-order features obtained from the Minkowski and Mahalanobis distances on multi-tag RFID measurements from abdominal belts for neonatal respiratory monitoring. the optimised threshold parameters above and below the zero value of the data for the classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%