Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Supercomputing - ICS '95 1995
DOI: 10.1145/224538.224567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Blue system overview

Abstract: This paper gives an overview of the system, and examines the prospects of reaching the goal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now know that these tasks are absolutely trivial for a machine and thus do not appear to test the machine's intelligence in any meaningful sense. Indeed even the mentally demanding task of playing chess can be largely reduced to brute force search [HCH95]. What else may in time be possible with relatively simple algorithms running on powerful machines is hard to say.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now know that these tasks are absolutely trivial for a machine and thus do not appear to test the machine's intelligence in any meaningful sense. Indeed even the mentally demanding task of playing chess can be largely reduced to brute force search [HCH95]. What else may in time be possible with relatively simple algorithms running on powerful machines is hard to say.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compound these problems, most performance metrics have been measured with the myopic lookahead search of depth one. This is in contrast to game-playing practice where most competitive systems gain a substantial benefit from a deeper search horizon (Schaeffer, Culberson, Treloar, Knight, Lu, & Szafron, 1992;Hsu, Campbell, & Hoane, 1995;Buro, 1995).We take a step towards a unified view of learning in real-time search and make four contributions. First, we introduce a simple three-parameter framework (named LRTS) that includes LRTA*, -LRTA* , SLA* and γ-Trap as its special cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the two primary focuses of AI research are conventional (or symbolic) and computational; since intelligence still has such a broad definition, the two handles separate humanbased intelligence parts. Conventional AI, which entails rational logical reasoning based on a system of symbols representing human knowledge in a declarative form [50], has been used for such applications as chess games (reasoning) [51], conversation programs (text mining), 15 and for organizing domain-specific knowledge (expert systems) [52]. While conventional AI is capable of limited reasoning, planning, and abstract thinking, researchers acknowledge that the use of symbols does not represent "mindful" comprehension, and is limited in terms of learning from experience [53].…”
Section: Human-based Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%