2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1069351306060073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep conducting zones in the junction region of the Kurile-Kamchatka and Aleutian island arcs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar data were used to build another tomography model, which was compared with petrophysical information by Khubunaya et al (2007), who estimated the melt fraction in a magma reservoir at approximately 2%. The derived seismic structures generally match with each other as well as with the resistivity distribution computed by Moroz and Moroz (2006). More recent models of the crust beneath the Klyuchevskoy group were presented by Koulakov et al (2011bKoulakov et al ( , 2013a.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar data were used to build another tomography model, which was compared with petrophysical information by Khubunaya et al (2007), who estimated the melt fraction in a magma reservoir at approximately 2%. The derived seismic structures generally match with each other as well as with the resistivity distribution computed by Moroz and Moroz (2006). More recent models of the crust beneath the Klyuchevskoy group were presented by Koulakov et al (2011bKoulakov et al ( , 2013a.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Magnetotelluric sounding by Moroz and Moroz (2006) revealed a low resistivity zone beneath the Bezymianny volcano interpreted to be a magma reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its location is that of a previously identified conductivity anomaly (Moroz, 1991), which was later refined by numerical simulation of the electromagnetic field. The increased electrical conductivity in that zone is thought to be due to inclusions of fluids and melts (Moroz and Moroz, 2006). Magma comes into the chamber from a long-lived subcrustal source situated in the asthenosphere beneath the KVC.…”
Section: The Geochemical Features Of Moderate Potassium Magnesian Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical surveys of the lithosphere beneath Klyuchevskoi are no less important for understanding the plausible existence of magma chambers beneath Klyuchevskoi and their spatial locations. Extensive surveys have been carried out using the methods of seismology, geoelectricity, and gravimetry (Anosov et al, 1978;Zubin et al, 1990;Balesta et al, 1991;Gontovaya et al, 2004;Moroz, 1991;Moroz and Moroz, 2006;Fedotov et al, 2010Fedotov et al, , 2011Fedotov et al, , 2014Koulakov et al, 2016;Ivanov et al, 2016). In recent years, seismic tomography began to be extensively used, probing the crust beneath Klyuchevskoi by seismic rays due to volcano-tectonic (VT) earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, it is observed that the number of earthquakes decreases drastically, and an anomalous electrical conductivity is identified from magnetotelluric sounding data [54]. Moroz and Nurmukhamedov [69] suppose that it is due to a high fluid saturation of the upper mantle, which may feed the active volcanoes of the volcanic belt. This low S-wave velocity pattern is enlarged in size at the northwest (north of ~55 °N), following the location of the Kliuchevskoi and Sheveluch volcanoes, confirming that these volcanoes must be a part of the same subduction-induced volcanic process [9], and not back arc volcanoes as suggested by Tatsumi et al [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%