2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018wr023528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Convolutional Encoder‐Decoder Networks for Uncertainty Quantification of Dynamic Multiphase Flow in Heterogeneous Media

Abstract: Surrogate strategies are used widely for uncertainty quantification of groundwater models in order to improve computational efficiency. However, their application to dynamic multiphase flow problems is hindered by the curse of dimensionality, the saturation discontinuity due to capillarity effects, and the time dependence of the multi‐output responses. In this paper, we propose a deep convolutional encoder‐decoder neural network methodology to tackle these issues. The surrogate modeling task is transformed to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
153
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the superior performance of the proposed DRDCN network architecture against the DDCN network architecture employed in our previous studies (Mo, Zabaras et al,, Mo, Zhu et al ; Zhu & Zabaras, ; Zhu et al, ) for surrogate modeling of systems with highly complex input‐output mappings, the DDCN network is also trained using the same training sets as those used in DRDCN. The DDCN network architecture is introduced in Appendix .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To illustrate the superior performance of the proposed DRDCN network architecture against the DDCN network architecture employed in our previous studies (Mo, Zabaras et al,, Mo, Zhu et al ; Zhu & Zabaras, ; Zhu et al, ) for surrogate modeling of systems with highly complex input‐output mappings, the DDCN network is also trained using the same training sets as those used in DRDCN. The DDCN network architecture is introduced in Appendix .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two factors together make the commonly used surrogate methods, such as Gaussian processes (Rasmussen & Williams, ) and polynomial chaos expansion (Xiu & Karniadakis, ), difficult to work. Deep neural networks have already exhibited a promising and impressive performance for surrogate modeling of forward models with high‐dimensional input and output fields (Kani & Elsheikh, ; Mo, Zabaras, et al, ; Mo, Zhu, et al ; Sun, ; Tripathy & Bilionis, ; Zhong et al, ; Zhu & Zabaras, ; Zhu et al, ). For example, in Tripathy and Bilionis () a deep neural network was proposed to build a surrogate model for a single‐phase flow forward model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating an error or measure of confidence in a data-driven prediction like n(x) is a well studied problem [15,16]. Applications of uncertainty quantification have recently begun appearing in materials science, with some even in DFT, such as the linear model exchange correlation functional of Aldegunde et al [17][18][19][20][21]. In this work, we show that useful applications of a predictive uncertainty in n(x) can be realised for just one of many possible approaches.…”
Section: Quantifying Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Zhu and Zabaras [181] developed an endto-end FCN model to capture the complex forward mapping between the high-dimensional input-output fields in a stochastic partial differential equation. Mo et al [182] developed a similar FCN model to learn the high-dimensional input-output relationship in a subsurface multiphase flow model by using paired permeability realizations and the corresponding system outputs for training. In Sun [183], a state-parameter identification GAN is formed to learn not only the forward mapping, but also the reverse mapping between high-dimensional model inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Hybrid Modeling and Reduced-order Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%