2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep convolutions for in-depth automated rock typing

Abstract: The description of rocks is one of the most time-consuming tasks in the everyday work of a geologist, especially when very accurate description is required. We here present a method that reduces the time needed for accurate description of rocks, enabling the geologist to work more efficiently. We describe the application of methods based on color distribution analysis and feature extraction. Then we focus on a new approach, used by us, which is based on convolutional neural networks. We used several well-known… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As lithofacies with similar grayscale and textural properties are expected to exhibit similar transport properties, porosity and permeability data from core analysis measurements were used to investigate the transport properties of the classified lithofacies. Figure 11 shows the porosity-permeability cross-plot for core plug samples from the same core data as in our CT images, where different colors correspond to the different lithofacies that have (6) f1-score = 2 × precision × recall precision + recall . been derived from the manual core description.…”
Section: Lithofacies Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As lithofacies with similar grayscale and textural properties are expected to exhibit similar transport properties, porosity and permeability data from core analysis measurements were used to investigate the transport properties of the classified lithofacies. Figure 11 shows the porosity-permeability cross-plot for core plug samples from the same core data as in our CT images, where different colors correspond to the different lithofacies that have (6) f1-score = 2 × precision × recall precision + recall . been derived from the manual core description.…”
Section: Lithofacies Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the study provided a plan to identify rocks in the geological survey field, the results of this study lacked comparisons with other CNNs model identification results. Baraboshkin compared and tested four heavy-duty CNNs [18]. The accuracy of the algorithm was as high as 95% on the validation set of the Googlenet architecture, but the model requires more resources in the calculation, and is not the best solution for the geological survey field.…”
Section: Realized Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of method solves the problem of strong subjectivity and high judgment cost. However, it is still necessary to create rock samples and to obtain the images of rock thin sections under a microscope [18], [21]. Moreover, the identification efficiency needs to improve, and the identification time should be reduced.…”
Section: Realized Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang Y et al efficiently completed the classification task of potassium feldspar, perlite, plagioclase, and quartz images by combining Transfer Learning technology with the InceptionV3 [27]. In the comparison of the different CNNs-based image classification models, Baraboshkin et al used AlexNet, VGGNet, and Inception to classify 20,000 rock images collected from different regions and strata [28]. Additionally, because of the excellent classification performance of CNNs models in mineral image classification tasks, it is also used for coal gangue discharge [29], [30] and iron ore image classification [31].…”
Section: Section 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%