2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep driver behavior detection model based on human brain consolidated learning for shared autonomy systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the network model in detecting the germination of wild rice seeds, the trained model was evaluated using the precision rate P (precision), the recall rate R (recall), the F1-score, and the mAP@0.5 ( Abouelnaga et al., 2018 ; Kong et al., 2019 ; Huang et al., 2021 ; Mariusz and Marek, 2022 ) (mean average precision) as assessment metrics so as to validate and compare the performance of the model. Among them, precision rate P denotes the accuracy of the model in predicting the target, recall rate R denotes the success of the model in searching the target, and F1-score is the reconciled average of precision and recall, which is considered to be equally important, with the maximum of 1 and the minimum of 0. mAP@0.5 measures how good the model is in detecting all the categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the network model in detecting the germination of wild rice seeds, the trained model was evaluated using the precision rate P (precision), the recall rate R (recall), the F1-score, and the mAP@0.5 ( Abouelnaga et al., 2018 ; Kong et al., 2019 ; Huang et al., 2021 ; Mariusz and Marek, 2022 ) (mean average precision) as assessment metrics so as to validate and compare the performance of the model. Among them, precision rate P denotes the accuracy of the model in predicting the target, recall rate R denotes the success of the model in searching the target, and F1-score is the reconciled average of precision and recall, which is considered to be equally important, with the maximum of 1 and the minimum of 0. mAP@0.5 measures how good the model is in detecting all the categories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vehicle detection is an important part of autonomous vehicles and road traffic, it can count vehicle information, traffic flow information, etc., which provides important information support for the making decision of government [1,2]. Traditionally, traffic video information is processed manually, but the development of artificial intelligence techniques has brought transformative progress to society, especially the continuous development in the field of computer vision, which makes the camera human-like processing ability [3][4][5]. Therefore, using computer vision-related methods for vehicle monitoring can greatly improve the efficiency of information processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influenced by adverse weather conditions and uncertain traffic flow, the accuracy and efficiency of visual perception drop off sharply (Huang et al, 2021). And the perception failure causality is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%