2006
DOI: 10.1130/g21951.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep electrical structure of the northern Cascadia (British Columbia, Canada) subduction zone: Implications for the distribution of fluids

Abstract: Long-period magnetotelluric data have been used to image the deep electrical structure of the Cascadia subduction zone in British Columbia, Canada. Zones of elevated electrical conductivity were found in both the forearc and backarc regions and are interpreted as a consequence of the fluid release from subducting slab. A shallow zone of high conductivity beneath Vancouver Island is likely due to fluids that are trapped above the subducting plate. East of this structure is a conductive (ϳ0.03 S/m) forearc mantl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b) is interpreted as pervasive serpentinization of the forearc mantle wedge (mainly antigorite). These findings are consistent with electrical resistivity studies in the forearc of Cascadia (McGary et al, 2014;Soyer and Unsworth, 2006) and point to…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5b) is interpreted as pervasive serpentinization of the forearc mantle wedge (mainly antigorite). These findings are consistent with electrical resistivity studies in the forearc of Cascadia (McGary et al, 2014;Soyer and Unsworth, 2006) and point to…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…5a). The forearc of the Cascadia subduction zone has been extensively studied from active and passive source surveys (e.g., Clowes et al, 1987;Green et al, 1986;Soyer and Unsworth, 2006). Bostock (2013) provides a recent review of the structural elements as determined from teleseismic receiver function and other geophysical studies.…”
Section: Cascadiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT electrical imaging provides additional constraints on fluid content. For instance, the seismogenic portion of the Cascadia subduction interface below Vancouver Island coincides with an inclined tabular zone of high electrical conductivity (Kurtz et al 1990;Soyer and Unsworth 2006). In southwest Japan, likewise, a highly reflective low-velocity layer dips c. 7°NW below Shikoku Island, down-dip from a subducting seamount on the inner wall of the Nankai Trough, defining the subduction interface that ruptured in the 1946 M w 8.1 Nankaido megathrust earthquake.…”
Section: Tensile Overpressure Compartments Along Subduction Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Vancouver Island and EMSLAB studies from the 1980, new images of the Cascadia subduction zone have been published by several authors (Aprea et al 1998;Vanyan 2002). This has included the first long-period MT data capable of imaging the lower crust and upper mantle of the Cascadia Subduction zone across southern British Columbia (Soyer and Unsworth 2006;see Fig. 13.21).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Geophysical Studies Of The Cascadia Submentioning
confidence: 99%