2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0229-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep embrittlement and complete rupture of the lithosphere during the Mw 8.2 Tehuantepec earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the choice of hypocenter can have a minor effect on the slip model inversion, but it does not change the main rupture features in the resulting slip models including the depth where the majority of slip occurs. This is supported by the comparison of our preferred model and another one at the hypocenter used by Melgar et al () as shown in Figure S9. Both slip models have a large asperity over depths of 10–70 km.…”
Section: Ffmsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally, the choice of hypocenter can have a minor effect on the slip model inversion, but it does not change the main rupture features in the resulting slip models including the depth where the majority of slip occurs. This is supported by the comparison of our preferred model and another one at the hypocenter used by Melgar et al () as shown in Figure S9. Both slip models have a large asperity over depths of 10–70 km.…”
Section: Ffmsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the aftershocks are mostly shallower than the slip zone, which precludes using the patterns to constrain the slip distribution, as apparent in Figure c. Aftershock patterns for intraplate ruptures are often complex and indicate activation of activity on faults other than the main rupture plane (e.g., Melgar et al, ; Ye et al, , ). The aftershock distribution coincides with the strong curvature of the upper slab interface in Slab2, along the intraplate transition from Pacific to Yakutat slab (Figure a; Kim et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it appears that relatively little structural damage occurred in the 2018 event (other than due to sediment slumping) in comparison to other near‐urban earthquakes like the 1989 Loma Prieta, 1994 Northridge, and 1995 Kobe events, likely as a result of improved building codes adopted after the 1964 earthquake, this type of event is very difficult to plan for, as deformation rates within subducting slabs are much harder to constrain or monitor than deformation on plate boundaries. Other major intraplate earthquakes of this type have occurred in Chile (e.g., Delouis & Legrand, ), Taiwan (e.g., Kanamori et al, ), Sumatra (e.g., Wiseman et al, ), the Philippines (e.g., Ye et al, ), the western Aleutians (e.g., Ye et al, ), Mexico (e.g., Melgar et al, ; Ye et al, ), and in 1949, 1965, and 2001 under Washington State (e.g., Bustin et al, ). When located below populated areas, such events can be very damaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last SSE of the region, which began in May 2017 and ended in June 2018, occurred during the period of intense seismic activity in the region. In September 2017, two large intraslab earthquakes take place, in Chiapas area (Mw 8.1, 07 September 2017) and in Puebla state (Mw 7.2, 19 September 2017) (Figure a) (Melgar, Pérez‐Campos, et al, ; Melgar, Ruiz‐Angulo, et al, ; Mirwald et al, ; Segou & Parsons, ; Suárez et al, ). In February 2018, an interface thrust earthquake occurred in Oaxaca state (Pinotepa earthquake, Mw 7.1, 16 February 2018).…”
Section: Context Of the Study Of Sses In The Mexican Subduction Zone mentioning
confidence: 99%