2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04221-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Ensemble Model with the Fusion of Character, Word and Lexicon Level Information for Emotion and Sentiment Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…various state-of-the-art and traditional techniques; and e) We also presented a detailed qualitative analysis on the errors encountered by our proposed method. In another work, Ghosal et al [18] developed a deep ensemble model that utilizes the character, word and lexicon level fusion for the sentiment and emotion prediction. The main contributions of our proposed work are highlighted below: a) We effectively combine deep learning and feature driven traditional model via an ensemble framework; b) We develop a stacked denoising autoencoder based technique for an enhanced word representation by leveraging the syntactic and semantic richness of the two distributed word representations; c) We perform normalization of tweets by utilizing various heuristics; and d) We build a stateof-the-art model that effectively solves both the problems of emotion analysis and sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…various state-of-the-art and traditional techniques; and e) We also presented a detailed qualitative analysis on the errors encountered by our proposed method. In another work, Ghosal et al [18] developed a deep ensemble model that utilizes the character, word and lexicon level fusion for the sentiment and emotion prediction. The main contributions of our proposed work are highlighted below: a) We effectively combine deep learning and feature driven traditional model via an ensemble framework; b) We develop a stacked denoising autoencoder based technique for an enhanced word representation by leveraging the syntactic and semantic richness of the two distributed word representations; c) We perform normalization of tweets by utilizing various heuristics; and d) We build a stateof-the-art model that effectively solves both the problems of emotion analysis and sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical tasks to which sentiment analysis and affective computing are jointly applied, are emotion recognition and polarity detection [22,[47][48][49][50], and different approaches can be found, including semantic, statistical and hybrid approaches. Semantic approaches [51] are typically based on the use of lexicons such as Affective Lexicon [2], WordNet-Affect [3], Senti-WordNet [4], EmotiNet [52], SenticNet [7] or lexicons based on Russell's dimensions [53,54], among others.…”
Section: Affective Computing and Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further to the quoted algorithms, 22 studies [317,452,505,319,124,512,461,488,489,344,448,352,353,356,47,449,381,386,387,275,475,117] used ensemble learning methods in their work, where they combined the output of several base machine learning and/or deep learning methods. In particular, [117] compared eight popular lexicon and machine learning based sentiment analysis algorithms, and then developed an ensemble that combines them, which in turn provided the best coverage results and competitive agreement.…”
Section: Hybrid (Hy)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, [117] compared eight popular lexicon and machine learning based sentiment analysis algorithms, and then developed an ensemble that combines them, which in turn provided the best coverage results and competitive agreement. Moreover, [505] proposes an MLP-based ensemble network that combines LSTM, CNN and feature-based MLP models, with each model incorporating character, word and lexicon level information, to predict the degree of intensity for sentiment and emotion. Lastly, as presented in Table 11, the RF ensemble learning method was used in the 21 studies [275,391,513,337,384,356,357,330,349,344,292,512,341,491,453,486,48,319,477,285,195].…”
Section: Hybrid (Hy)mentioning
confidence: 99%