2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep etching of Zerodur glass ceramics in a fluorine-based plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before, plasma etching of fused silica and Zerodur were demonstrated as published elsewhere. [ 11,13,14 ] The reported optimized etching conditions served within our studies as the starting point to explore as well the deep etching of ULE 7972 that enabled simultaneously a comparative investigation of the impact of certain material properties. The process parameters used in this article are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned before, plasma etching of fused silica and Zerodur were demonstrated as published elsewhere. [ 11,13,14 ] The reported optimized etching conditions served within our studies as the starting point to explore as well the deep etching of ULE 7972 that enabled simultaneously a comparative investigation of the impact of certain material properties. The process parameters used in this article are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substrate‐based fabrication with an accuracy in a single‐digit micrometer range and the respective reproducibility can be achieved by using high‐resolution UV lithography and deep reactive ion etching as already demonstrated in complex glass and glass ceramics. [ 10,11 ] Nanoimprint techniques in combination with reactive ion etching can be used as well if highly ordered glass nanostructures are targeted. [ 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For visible wavelength both monolith Y 2 O 3 and MgAl 2 O 4 are transparent, while YM is opaque owing to scattering caused not by pores but mismatch in refractive index between Y 2 O 3 and MgO. Meanwhile, the evaluation of plasmaresistance remains both unclear and controversial 4,36 . Accordingly, another way to characterize the etching behavior is to profile the etched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%