2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that, the Diag-Net has achieved the state-of-art with mean accuracy 93.4% and AUC score 0.95. When compared with the second best algorithm [16], the DiagNet's AUC score is significantly higher with experiments on the whole dataset without any pre-processing, post-processing or transfer learning. In addition, empirical observations show that our model is robust to noise and geometric transforms, and these results are omitted due to the space limitation.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It shows that, the Diag-Net has achieved the state-of-art with mean accuracy 93.4% and AUC score 0.95. When compared with the second best algorithm [16], the DiagNet's AUC score is significantly higher with experiments on the whole dataset without any pre-processing, post-processing or transfer learning. In addition, empirical observations show that our model is robust to noise and geometric transforms, and these results are omitted due to the space limitation.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As also mentioned in section 1, inadequate data and the similarity between benign and cancerous masses [7] are two main reasons causing high false positives in mammographic CADs. Recently, [1,16,17] employed GANs to create new instances. Even though they generated on-distribution samples that are not separable by discriminators, they ignored the importance of distinguishable but similar instances, which tend to improve the discriminative ability.…”
Section: Adversarial Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional mammographic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems rely heavily on elaborate hand-crafted fea- tures [2]. Recently, leveraging the insights from the successes of deep neural networks (deep learning) in computer vision tasks [5][6][7][8][9], deep learning based algorithms have been applied to mammograms and have achieved state-of-the-art results for mass detection, segmentation and classification. Mass detection aims to find the regions of interest (ROIs) where abnormalities may be located, and mass segmentation provides detailed morphological features with precise outlines within ROIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, a novel architecture is designed in this paper. Based on the accurate pixel-level labelling algorithm presented in [4] and the related breast mass classifiers [2,3,5,7,8,10,11], a Dual-path Conditional Residual Network (DUALCORENET) for mammography analysis is proposed as shown in Figure 1. Firstly, a mass and its context texture learner called the Locality Preserving Learner (LPL) is built with stacks of convolutional blocks, achieving a mapping from ROIs to class labels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%