2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.27.441676
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Design with 3D Pharmacophoric Constraints

Abstract: Generative models have increasingly been proposed as a solution to the molecular design problem. However, it has proved challenging to control the design process or incorporate prior knowledge, limiting their practical use in drug discovery. In particular, generative methods have made limited use of three-dimensional (3D) structural information even though this is critical to binding. This work describes a method to incorporate such information and demonstrates the benefit of doing so. We combine an existing g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the BOMB approach to molecular design 13 , we grow from a fixed ligand core in order to maximise the use of binding mode information from structural biology sources, and rely on the user's medicinal chemistry expertise to suggest functional groups that improve binding affinity whilst remaining synthetically tractable. Alternative, generative methods for fragment growth 11,12 could be incorporated in future, but testing of expert medicinal chemist designs still remains popular today and FEgrow aims to automate this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by the BOMB approach to molecular design 13 , we grow from a fixed ligand core in order to maximise the use of binding mode information from structural biology sources, and rely on the user's medicinal chemistry expertise to suggest functional groups that improve binding affinity whilst remaining synthetically tractable. Alternative, generative methods for fragment growth 11,12 could be incorporated in future, but testing of expert medicinal chemist designs still remains popular today and FEgrow aims to automate this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics-based molecular mechanics-generalised Born with surface area (MM-GBSA) was then used to provide a more accurate score. Further, more recent, examples include FragExplorer 9 , which aims to grow or replace fragments to optimise molecular interaction fields generated by the GRID software 10 , DeepFrag 11 , which predicts appropriate fragment additions using a deep convolutional neural network trained on thousands of known protein-ligand complexes, and DEVELOP 12 , which uses deep generative models to output 3D molecules conditional on provided phamacophoric features of the binding site. However, the employed approximate physics-or knowledge-based approaches to scoring the designs will limit to some extent their ability to predict and optimise binding affinity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the structure-activity relationship between the biological activity and the molecules generated by such methods is ambiguous. DeLinker 19 and SyntaLinker 20 adopt fragment-based drug design and retain active fragments while updating linkers to generate active molecules, and DEVELOP 17 combines DeLinker with chemical features as constraints to improve the quality of the generated molecules. The fragment-based approaches require explicit knowledge of the active fragments, which lead to a limited chemical space for the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the choice of ligand-based drug design or structure-based drug design depends on what information can be used, which narrows down the application scenarios of many methods. It is clear that incorporating expert knowledge in the generation process is beneficial to the full utilization of bioactivity data information 17 . Therefore, combining deep generative models with knowledge in biochemistry to efficiently use the scarce data to design biologically active molecules is a crucial project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De novo design using generative models has become increasingly common in the eld of molecular optimization, particularly for fragment growing [30][31][32][33][34][35] and linking [36][37][38][39]. However, there are no such existing models for performing fragment merging, partly owing to the lack of data and difculty in generating synthetic data for training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%