2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c02564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Modeling of Infrared Images Provides Signature of Cracking in Cross-Linked Polyethylene Pipe

Abstract: Hyperspectral infrared (IR) images contain a large amount of highly spatially resolved information about the chemical composition of a sample. However, the analysis of hyperspectral IR imaging data for complex heterogeneous systems can be challenging because of the spectroscopic and spatial complexity of the data. We implement a deep generative modeling approach using a β-variational autoencoder to learn disentangled representations of the generative factors of variance in a data set of crosslinked polyethylen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The β-VAE loss function minimized by the neural network optimizer is the sum of two components: the mean squared error (MSE) of the reconstruction compared to the input and a scaled Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence term, where the KL divergence measures the difference between two probability distributions β _ VAE loss = MSE loss + β · KL divergence Typically, β > 1, which increases the weight of the KL divergence term in the loss function relative to that of the MSE loss term. , The balance between the two terms in eq is tuned by the choice of β. The most informative learned latent dimensions are identified as those with the largest KL divergence cost that produce the largest changes in the decoded spectra while holding the other latent dimensions constant …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The β-VAE loss function minimized by the neural network optimizer is the sum of two components: the mean squared error (MSE) of the reconstruction compared to the input and a scaled Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence term, where the KL divergence measures the difference between two probability distributions β _ VAE loss = MSE loss + β · KL divergence Typically, β > 1, which increases the weight of the KL divergence term in the loss function relative to that of the MSE loss term. , The balance between the two terms in eq is tuned by the choice of β. The most informative learned latent dimensions are identified as those with the largest KL divergence cost that produce the largest changes in the decoded spectra while holding the other latent dimensions constant …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenging aspects of using IR microscopy to study the spatial distribution of IR spectra of different samples aged under different environmental conditions is understanding the large amount of data that is generated. Instead of using a univariate analysis to focus on specific IR absorption bands to interpret these large amounts of data as has been done in previous studies, , machine learning approaches such as deep or generative learning have been used recently in the field of materials science to provide new insights into the analysis of large amounts of spectroscopy and microscopy data. Recently, we developed a deep learning β-variational autoencoder (β-VAE) model to analyze IR spectra of PEX-a pipe. , β-VAEs are a class of deep generative models that can learn disentangled (independent and interpretable) representations of the generative factors responsible for variance in data. We previously trained our β-VAE model on a diverse data set of 25,000 IR spectra of PEX-a pipe exposed to different environmental conditions . We learned three informative latent dimensions corresponding to three physicochemical processes responsible for the variance in the IR microscopy data: the most informative latent dimension, L1, which describes the hydrolysis of a stabilizing additive; the second latent dimension, L2, which describes the oxidative degradation of amorphous polyethylene; and the third latent dimension, L3, which describes crack-specific degradation characterized by ketone carbonyl and conjugated alkene formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations