2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.04.510898
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep generative modeling of sample-level heterogeneity in single-cell genomics

Abstract: Contemporary single-cell omics technologies have enabled complex experimental designs incorporating hundreds of samples accompanied by detailed information on sample-level conditions. Current approaches for analyzing condition-level heterogeneity in these experiments often rely on a simplification of the data such as an aggregation at the cell-type or cell-state-neighborhood level. Here we present MrVI, a deep generative model that provides sample-sample comparisons at a single-cell resolution, permitting the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by successful implementations of deep generative models in single-cell omics analysis (scvi-tools 20 , scvi 21 , totalVI 22 , scArches 23 , trVAE 24 , scANVI 25 , MrVI 26 ), Starfysh jointly models ST and histology as data observed from a shared low-dimensional latent representation while incorporating anchors as priors ( Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by successful implementations of deep generative models in single-cell omics analysis (scvi-tools 20 , scvi 21 , totalVI 22 , scArches 23 , trVAE 24 , scANVI 25 , MrVI 26 ), Starfysh jointly models ST and histology as data observed from a shared low-dimensional latent representation while incorporating anchors as priors ( Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep generative models parameterized by neural networks have proven effective in analyzing single-cell RNA expression data (scvi-tools 20 , scvi 21 , totalVI 22 , scArches 23 , trVAE 24 , scANVI 25 , MrVI 26 , etc). However, the presence of multiple cell types in each spot in ST data makes it difficult for these models to disentangle the cell-type-specific features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations, however, are shared across current tissue-centric tailored methods. In contrast, models based on generative deep learning (De Donno et al , 2022; Boyeau et al , 2022) and the Wasserstein metric (Joodaki et al , 2022; Chen et al , 2020) can take advantage of single-cell measurements to estimate sample-level heterogeneity, but the interpretability of their estimated latent space is limited in comparison to the MOFA models, where features and cell-types can be associated with each factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While here we applied a naive approach to define sample similarity (suppl. figure 7A), novel methods to model sample-level heterogeneity in scRNA-seq data are being explored (Chen et al ., 2020; Boyeau et al ., 2022; Mitchel et al ., 2022). These could improve the matching of disease samples to optimal controls, and provide new insights into which technical and demographic variables are likely to affect disease-to-healthy comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%