Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Reservoir simulations for CO2 sequestration are computationally expensive because they run for centuries or millennia. Shortened, cheaper simulation timelines prevent the observation of gas leakages that might occur over a longer duration. In the statistics community, the exclusion of these leakages is called censorship. We propose a fast simulator surrogate that captures these potentially unobservable long-term risks. The crux of our approach is survival analysis, a branch of statistics tailored to handle censored data. Our proposed framework begins by sampling scenarios with varied injection and production rates from a number of geological and flow uncertainty realizations. The potentially censored time to gas leakage is recorded for each simulated scenario. We then leverage varied survival analysis methods, ranging from Kaplan-Meier to Random Survival Forests, to create a computationally cheap, and highly interpretable, simulator surrogate. The surrogate can predict the risk of CO2 leakage in new scenarios for significantly shorter simulations than usual in carbon sequestration studies, or no new simulations at all. This eases the computational burden of centuries-long, expensive simulations. In order to validate our methodology, we constructed an exploratory case study with a shortened monitoring window. The proposed framework is implemented within a compositional simulation model where CO2 is injected into a saline aquifer. To assess the risk of leakage and caprock integrity, we simulated scenarios where we inject CO2 for permanent storage using 4 injector wells, while 5 producer wells are used for pressure maintenance. This model is run for 2000 days under varied permeability realizations to monitor CO2 breakthrough from the production wells. We then infer the occurrence of leakage in new scenarios and compare these results to full simulations via appropriate statistical metrics such as hypothesis testing, metrics tailored for the censored data context and usual prediction metrics. Initial results show that the proposed method predicts time to gas leakage with good accuracy without the need for any new simulations at all. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to approach the carbon storage optimization issue with survival analysis, a clear fit due to the presence of censored data coming from shortened simulations. Our unique, novel framework yields a simulator surrogate built with techniques never-before-seen in this context. Also, we fill the gap other approaches leave open by focusing on interpretability, a model quality that is paramount to decision-making under high uncertainty.
Reservoir simulations for CO2 sequestration are computationally expensive because they run for centuries or millennia. Shortened, cheaper simulation timelines prevent the observation of gas leakages that might occur over a longer duration. In the statistics community, the exclusion of these leakages is called censorship. We propose a fast simulator surrogate that captures these potentially unobservable long-term risks. The crux of our approach is survival analysis, a branch of statistics tailored to handle censored data. Our proposed framework begins by sampling scenarios with varied injection and production rates from a number of geological and flow uncertainty realizations. The potentially censored time to gas leakage is recorded for each simulated scenario. We then leverage varied survival analysis methods, ranging from Kaplan-Meier to Random Survival Forests, to create a computationally cheap, and highly interpretable, simulator surrogate. The surrogate can predict the risk of CO2 leakage in new scenarios for significantly shorter simulations than usual in carbon sequestration studies, or no new simulations at all. This eases the computational burden of centuries-long, expensive simulations. In order to validate our methodology, we constructed an exploratory case study with a shortened monitoring window. The proposed framework is implemented within a compositional simulation model where CO2 is injected into a saline aquifer. To assess the risk of leakage and caprock integrity, we simulated scenarios where we inject CO2 for permanent storage using 4 injector wells, while 5 producer wells are used for pressure maintenance. This model is run for 2000 days under varied permeability realizations to monitor CO2 breakthrough from the production wells. We then infer the occurrence of leakage in new scenarios and compare these results to full simulations via appropriate statistical metrics such as hypothesis testing, metrics tailored for the censored data context and usual prediction metrics. Initial results show that the proposed method predicts time to gas leakage with good accuracy without the need for any new simulations at all. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to approach the carbon storage optimization issue with survival analysis, a clear fit due to the presence of censored data coming from shortened simulations. Our unique, novel framework yields a simulator surrogate built with techniques never-before-seen in this context. Also, we fill the gap other approaches leave open by focusing on interpretability, a model quality that is paramount to decision-making under high uncertainty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.