2018
DOI: 10.1145/3197517.3201313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep image-based relighting from optimal sparse samples

Abstract: a) Input images under directional lights (c) Our result under a novel directional light (b) Ground truth under a novel directional light (d) Our results under environment map illumination Fig. 1. We propose a learning-based method that takes only five images of a scene under directional lights (a, light directions marked on circle in red) and reconstructs its appearance (c) under a novel directional light in the upper hemisphere (marked in orange). Our method trains a fully-convolutional neural network to join… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at several works [ZD14, PLGM∗17a], it seems that, using a similar number of coefficients, PTM/HSH and DMD provide similar results. The results reported by Xu et al [XSHR18] show that the CNN based relighting presented may provide higher PSNR than PTM and BRDF based methods [HS17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Looking at several works [ZD14, PLGM∗17a], it seems that, using a similar number of coefficients, PTM/HSH and DMD provide similar results. The results reported by Xu et al [XSHR18] show that the CNN based relighting presented may provide higher PSNR than PTM and BRDF based methods [HS17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the typical “blended” shadows, less evident in the local interpolation of dense sampling, but still clearly visible. Global CNN‐based relighting methods [XSHR18] solve this problem, but create sharp shadows with hallucinated shape, not corresponding to the real one (Fig. 13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations