2017
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-7947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Integration and UK-EU Trade Relations

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced form estimates calculated above are based on estimates of the impact of Brexit on the UK's trade with the EU. Ebell (2016), HM Treasury (2016) and Mulabdic, Osnago, and Ruta (2017) all find positive effects of EU membership on trade levels and although the size of the effects varies across papers it is generally larger than estimated by Baier, Bergstrand, Egger, and McLaughlin (2008). 20 For example, Mulabdic, Osnago, and Ruta (2017) estimate how Brexit will affect UK trade using a new database on the coverage of different trade agreements collected by Hofmann, Osnago, and Ruta (2017).…”
Section: Reduced Form Brexit Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduced form estimates calculated above are based on estimates of the impact of Brexit on the UK's trade with the EU. Ebell (2016), HM Treasury (2016) and Mulabdic, Osnago, and Ruta (2017) all find positive effects of EU membership on trade levels and although the size of the effects varies across papers it is generally larger than estimated by Baier, Bergstrand, Egger, and McLaughlin (2008). 20 For example, Mulabdic, Osnago, and Ruta (2017) estimate how Brexit will affect UK trade using a new database on the coverage of different trade agreements collected by Hofmann, Osnago, and Ruta (2017).…”
Section: Reduced Form Brexit Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the estimates inTable 5, column 1 implies leaving the EU and joining EFTA would reduce the UK's trade with EU members by (e 0.19 − e 0.65 )/e 0.65 = 36.9% which implies a decline in UK income per capita of between 9.2% and 13.8%. By using the estimates inTable 6, column 1 we obtain a more conservative estimate of the costs of Brexit.21 These numbers are calculated using the estimates inTable 6ofMulabdic, Osnago, and Ruta (2017) together with the fact that in 2014 goods made up 72% UK-EU trade and services 28% (Office for National Statistics, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes: Depth decreases from 44 to 36 in the "Norway" scenario, to 14 in the "average PTA", and to 0 in the "noagreement" scenario. Source: Mulabdic et al (2017)…”
Section: Undoing Trade Agreements: Brexit and Gvcs 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, according to Johnson (2014) and Acemoglu et al (2012) the emergence of global production networks implies that one can no longer consider bilateral trade in isolation when evaluating trade policy or idiosyncratic shocks. This is particularly true in the case of Brexit considering that most trade between the UK and EU countries is in intermediate inputs (see section 4; Mulabdic et al, 2017;J. Chen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Econometric Models In Brexit Impact Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%