2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep11334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep intronic GPR143 mutation in a Japanese family with ocular albinism

Abstract: Deep intronic mutations are often ignored as possible causes of human disease. Using whole-exome sequencing, we analysed genomic DNAs of a Japanese family with two male siblings affected by ocular albinism and congenital nystagmus. Although mutations or copy number alterations of coding regions were not identified in candidate genes, the novel intronic mutation c.659-131 T > G within GPR143 intron 5 was identified as hemizygous in affected siblings and as heterozygous in the unaffected mother. This mutation wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is the first intronic variant outside of the splice site consensus sequences deemed pathogenic in TULP1 , the causality of deep‐intronic variants has also been described in nine other retinal dystrophy genes: ABCA4 , CEP290 , CHM , OA1 , OAT, OFD1 , PROM1 , PRPF31 , and USH2A (Bax et al., ; Braun et al., ; Carss et al., ; den Hollander et al., ; Liquori et al., ; Mayer et al., ; Naruto et al., ; Rio Frio et al., ; Vache et al., ; van den Hurk et al., ; Webb et al., ) (http://www.dbass.soton.ac.uk). Intronic variants are likely to explain a substantial portion of the current genetically unexplained or monoallelic retinal dystrophy cases, and underscore the importance of genetic tests uncovering those regions, such as whole genome sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While this is the first intronic variant outside of the splice site consensus sequences deemed pathogenic in TULP1 , the causality of deep‐intronic variants has also been described in nine other retinal dystrophy genes: ABCA4 , CEP290 , CHM , OA1 , OAT, OFD1 , PROM1 , PRPF31 , and USH2A (Bax et al., ; Braun et al., ; Carss et al., ; den Hollander et al., ; Liquori et al., ; Mayer et al., ; Naruto et al., ; Rio Frio et al., ; Vache et al., ; van den Hurk et al., ; Webb et al., ) (http://www.dbass.soton.ac.uk). Intronic variants are likely to explain a substantial portion of the current genetically unexplained or monoallelic retinal dystrophy cases, and underscore the importance of genetic tests uncovering those regions, such as whole genome sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is an increasing number of reports describing disease-causing mutations in non-coding sequences in RD families [ 8 , 58 61 ]. However, such reports are mainly based on incidental findings and there is a lack of a systematic study on the prevalence of such “cryptic” mutations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous IRD-associated intronic variants have created new splice acceptor or donor sites that allowed the insertion of a PE. 22,30,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] To our knowledge we are the first to report on the insertion of a PE that is not due to this mechanism but possibly because of the creation of new ESE motifs in IRDs. Previously, the loss of an ESE and the creation of a splicing suppressor has been reported in the OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene array due to the coding variant c.532A>G (p.Ile178Val), which is associated with exon 3 exclusion and a congenital color vision defect (MIM: 303800 and 303900).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%