2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning analysis provides accurate COVID-19 diagnosis on chest computed tomography

Abstract: Introduction Computed Tomography is an essential diagnostic tool in the management of COVID-19. Considering the large amount of examinations in high case-load scenarios, an automated tool could facilitate and save critical time in the diagnosis and risk stratification of the disease. Methods A novel deep learning derived machine learning (ML) classifier was developed using a simplified programming approach and an open source dataset consisting of 6868 chest CT images fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, diagnostic performance of the participating radiologists on identification of COVID-19 was generally comparable to radiologists in other studies with similar sensitivity, specificity and accuracy 11 , 37 . In consistent with previous DL studies 11 , 37 , 38 , DL-MLP demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance to the experienced senior radiologist on both internal and external testing datasets in terms of detection sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Adequate performance on the external testing dataset further increased the reliability of the end-to-end DL-MLP model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Notably, diagnostic performance of the participating radiologists on identification of COVID-19 was generally comparable to radiologists in other studies with similar sensitivity, specificity and accuracy 11 , 37 . In consistent with previous DL studies 11 , 37 , 38 , DL-MLP demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance to the experienced senior radiologist on both internal and external testing datasets in terms of detection sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Adequate performance on the external testing dataset further increased the reliability of the end-to-end DL-MLP model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We have searched existing techniques in the online literature using different keywords such as “Machine learning and COVID-19”, “COVID-19 diagnosis with CT scans”, and “COVID-19 diagnosis with CT scans and machine learning”. While going through the online existing literature (peer-reviewed) published in reputed journals, we found a plethora of machine learning techniques to diagnose COVID-19 using chest CT scans with varying sources and amount of training data [ [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] ]. All these previously published techniques can be categorized into three main classes as follows: Deep learning-based, transfer learning with fine-tuning a customized fully connected layer, shallow learning with handcrafted textured features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the number of enrolled images, 32,857 images (19,623‬ COVID-19 images and 13,234 Healthy images) classified by analysis were included. The AI algorithm based on the neural network was established in a number of research articles [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 ]. Among the included studies, twenty-nine models were selected for meta-analysis on DL assisted detection for predict COVID-19 [ 21 , 22 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 ] and fourteen models on ML assisted detection for predict COVID-19 [ 21 , 24 , 28 , 31 , 38 , 43 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 37 studies [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ] of image-based analysis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90 - 0.91), specificity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90 - 0.91), the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91 - 0.98), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 88.98 (95% CI, 56.38 – 140.44) as shown in ( Figure 2 ) ( Supplementary Figures 2-8 ).
Figure 2 The summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves of the diagnostic performance of AI and CT-Scan on detection.
…”
Section: Diagnostic Test Accuracy (Dta)mentioning
confidence: 99%