2018 Fifth International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/eorsa.2018.8598577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Approach for Rock Outcrops Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution stimulates the development of artificial intelligence, where geoscience studies have seamlessly adapted machine learning applications into their methodology (Caté et al 2017;Chen and Schuster 2020;Liu et al 2020;Feng et al 2021;Ramdani et al 2021). The study of carbonate outcrop analogs is perhaps one of the branches of Geoscience that does not see an extensive application of machine learning despite its potential (Francis et al 2014;Kirsch et al 2018;Kwok et al 2018;Marques Junior et al 2020;Ramdani et al 2021). Converting seismic images into outcrops can be viewed as an image-to-image translation problem.…”
Section: Methodology Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution stimulates the development of artificial intelligence, where geoscience studies have seamlessly adapted machine learning applications into their methodology (Caté et al 2017;Chen and Schuster 2020;Liu et al 2020;Feng et al 2021;Ramdani et al 2021). The study of carbonate outcrop analogs is perhaps one of the branches of Geoscience that does not see an extensive application of machine learning despite its potential (Francis et al 2014;Kirsch et al 2018;Kwok et al 2018;Marques Junior et al 2020;Ramdani et al 2021). Converting seismic images into outcrops can be viewed as an image-to-image translation problem.…”
Section: Methodology Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods for the automatic detection of rocky outcrops are mostly based on satellite images (Kwok et al 2018), which can cause rocky outcrops under forest canopy to be overlooked, or on the delineation from DTM based only on slope values (Smith and Mullins 2021), which can miss small outcrops on flat areas or misinterpret rocky outcrops as steep (soil-)covered slopes. Therefore, we developed a new two-step approach for the quantitative detection of rocky outcrops (Fig.…”
Section: Rocky Outcrops Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are primarily improving visual differences between lithologies by transforming spectral bands into separable combinations according to their diagnostic characteristics, or making a comparison of similarity in the spectrum between the collected remote sensing data and spectral reflectance measured in the laboratory. The second group of methods, namely machine learning, involving random forest [12], [18], support vector machine [19], [20], and neural network [21], [22], they provide a way to quantitatively describe the distribution of geological features compared with the traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%