2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2978094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Modulation Recognition Method in the Presence of Phase Offset

Abstract: Automatic modulation recognition (AMR) plays an important role in various communications systems. It has the ability of adaptive modulation and can adapt to various complex environments. Automatic modulation recognition is also widely used in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. However, because the recognition accuracy of traditional methods to extract the features of OFDM signals is very limited. In order to solve these problems, many deep learning based AMR methods have been proposed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed module employed an ANN in order to estimate both CFO and PO of received signals. In contrast to [41], this module eliminates the effects of both CFO and PO by shifting the signal frequency and phase prior to modulation recognition. The work reported in [53] exploited the attention mechanism for the fusion of the extracted multi-scale features.…”
Section: B: Classification Using Iq Samples From Existing Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed module employed an ANN in order to estimate both CFO and PO of received signals. In contrast to [41], this module eliminates the effects of both CFO and PO by shifting the signal frequency and phase prior to modulation recognition. The work reported in [53] exploited the attention mechanism for the fusion of the extracted multi-scale features.…”
Section: B: Classification Using Iq Samples From Existing Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DL-AMR methods outperform the traditional modulation recognition ones [127], but there is still a long way for signal recognition in real electromagnetic environments and practical applications. The performance of FB-based AMR methods tends to degrade badly with channel impairment effects such as the high-speed mobility and impulsive nature of noise [20], multipath fading effects [32], PO [41], CFO [52], and heavy noises and interferences [88]. However, the quality of service in the complex communication environment under low SNRs is hard to be guaranteed and, therefore, further investigation is required for the robustness of DL classifiers in a larger range of SNR [43].…”
Section: A Electromagnetic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [20] proposes a robust CNN-based approach that can precisely classify four types of modulation, including BPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, and 16QAM in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system under the presence of Phase offset (PO). In [21], CNN and LSTM have been used to solve the AMC problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various MC algorithms for the OFDM systems were carried out in [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. The algorithms for multiple-input multiple-output and OFDM (MIMO-OFDM) systems based on deep neural network (DNN) and Gibbs sampling are investigated in [ 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%