2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02642-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based dental implant recognition using synthetic X-ray images

Abstract: A novel algorithm for generating artificial training samples from triangulated three-dimensional (3D) surface models within the context of dental implant recognition is proposed. The proposed algorithm is based on the calculation of two-dimensional (2D) projections (from a number of different angles) of 3D volumetric representations of computer-aided design (CAD) surface models. A fully convolutional network (FCN) is subsequently trained on the artificially generated X-ray images for the purpose of automatical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the involved studies were published in the last four years (2020: six; 2021: four; 2022: five; 2023: six) (Figure 2). Out of selected 21 studies, 12 were conducted in the Republic of Korea [31,48,51,[53][54][55][57][58][59][60][61][62], four in Japan [30,47,50,52], and one each in Brazil [49], India [56], France [46], South Africa [32], and the United States [63] (Figure 3). Some of the included studies were conducted by the same research groups (Kong et al [31,61], Park et al [48,62], Sukegawa et al [30,50,52], and Lee et al [51,53,54]).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All the involved studies were published in the last four years (2020: six; 2021: four; 2022: five; 2023: six) (Figure 2). Out of selected 21 studies, 12 were conducted in the Republic of Korea [31,48,51,[53][54][55][57][58][59][60][61][62], four in Japan [30,47,50,52], and one each in Brazil [49], India [56], France [46], South Africa [32], and the United States [63] (Figure 3). Some of the included studies were conducted by the same research groups (Kong et al [31,61], Park et al [48,62], Sukegawa et al [30,50,52], and Lee et al [51,53,54]).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of algorithm networks evaluated for accuracy varied in the selected studies. Ten studies [46][47][48][49]51,53,57,58,60,62] evaluated the accuracy of one algorithm network; three evaluated two algorithm networks [32,59,61]; two tested three algorithm networks [31,54]; one tested four algorithm networks [56]; three tested five algorithm networks [50,52,55]; one study each tested six [30] and ten [63] algorithm networks. All the included studies evaluated the accuracy of tested AI tools in implant detection and classification, whereas four studies [51,53,60,62] also compared this to trained dental professionals.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations