2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09573-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning–based diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases and bone islands in computed tomograph images: a multicenter diagnostic study

Abstract: Objective To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model based on CT for differentiating bone islands and osteoblastic bone metastases. Materials and methods The patients with sclerosing bone lesions (SBLs) were retrospectively included in three hospitals. The images from site 1 were randomly assigned to the training (70%) and intrinsic verification (10%) datasets for developing the two-dimensional (2D) DL model (single-slice input) and “2.5-dimensiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in this study, we employed a DTL model constructed using 2.5D segmentation to assess the aggressiveness of PCa. Our approach is akin to the 2.5D network described in prior literature ( 32 , 34 ), which selects the largest lesion layer as the central layer and utilizes the upper and lower layers as input data. This segmentation strategy mirrors that of many other organs, such as the brain ( 35 , 36 ), liver ( 37 ), pancreas ( 38 ), and kidney ( 39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in this study, we employed a DTL model constructed using 2.5D segmentation to assess the aggressiveness of PCa. Our approach is akin to the 2.5D network described in prior literature ( 32 , 34 ), which selects the largest lesion layer as the central layer and utilizes the upper and lower layers as input data. This segmentation strategy mirrors that of many other organs, such as the brain ( 35 , 36 ), liver ( 37 ), pancreas ( 38 ), and kidney ( 39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%