Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND Due to frequent and high-risk sports activities, the elbow joint is susceptible to injury, especially to cartilage tissue, which can cause pain, limited movement and even loss of joint function. AIM To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) multisequence imaging for improving the diagnostic accuracy of adult elbow cartilage injury. METHODS A total of 60 patients diagnosed with elbow cartilage injury in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We analyzed the accuracy of conventional MRI sequences (T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, proton density weighted imaging, and T2 star weighted image) and Three-Dimensional Coronary Imaging by Spiral Scanning (3D-CISS) in the diagnosis of elbow cartilage injury. Arthroscopy was used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic effect of single and combination sequences in different injury degrees and the consistency with arthroscopy. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy of 3D-CISS sequence was 89.34% ± 4.98%, the sensitivity was 90%, and the specificity was 88.33%, which showed the best performance among all sequences (P < 0.05). The combined application of the whole sequence had the highest accuracy in all sequence combinations, the accuracy of mild injury was 91.30%, the accuracy of moderate injury was 96.15%, and the accuracy of severe injury was 93.33% (P < 0.05). Compared with arthroscopy, the combination of all MRI sequences had the highest consistency of 91.67%, and the kappa value reached 0.890 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Combination of 3D-CISS and each sequence had significant advantages in improving MRI diagnostic accuracy of elbow cartilage injuries in adults. Multisequence MRI is recommended to ensure the best diagnosis and treatment.
BACKGROUND Due to frequent and high-risk sports activities, the elbow joint is susceptible to injury, especially to cartilage tissue, which can cause pain, limited movement and even loss of joint function. AIM To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) multisequence imaging for improving the diagnostic accuracy of adult elbow cartilage injury. METHODS A total of 60 patients diagnosed with elbow cartilage injury in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We analyzed the accuracy of conventional MRI sequences (T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, proton density weighted imaging, and T2 star weighted image) and Three-Dimensional Coronary Imaging by Spiral Scanning (3D-CISS) in the diagnosis of elbow cartilage injury. Arthroscopy was used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic effect of single and combination sequences in different injury degrees and the consistency with arthroscopy. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy of 3D-CISS sequence was 89.34% ± 4.98%, the sensitivity was 90%, and the specificity was 88.33%, which showed the best performance among all sequences (P < 0.05). The combined application of the whole sequence had the highest accuracy in all sequence combinations, the accuracy of mild injury was 91.30%, the accuracy of moderate injury was 96.15%, and the accuracy of severe injury was 93.33% (P < 0.05). Compared with arthroscopy, the combination of all MRI sequences had the highest consistency of 91.67%, and the kappa value reached 0.890 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Combination of 3D-CISS and each sequence had significant advantages in improving MRI diagnostic accuracy of elbow cartilage injuries in adults. Multisequence MRI is recommended to ensure the best diagnosis and treatment.
IntroductionWhite matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are frequently observed on magnetic resonance (MR) images in older adults, commonly appearing as areas of high signal intensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR scans. Elevated WMH volumes are associated with a greater risk of dementia and stroke, even after accounting for vascular risk factors. Manual segmentation, while considered the ground truth, is both labor-intensive and time-consuming, limiting the generation of annotated WMH datasets. Un-annotated data are relatively available; however, the requirement of annotated data poses a challenge for developing supervised machine learning models.MethodsTo address this challenge, we implemented a multi-stage semi-supervised learning (M3SL) approach that first uses un-annotated data segmented by traditional processing methods (“bronze” and “silver” quality data) and then uses a smaller number of “gold”-standard annotations for model refinement. The M3SL approach enabled fine-tuning of the model weights with the gold-standard annotations. This approach was integrated into the training of a U-Net model for WMH segmentation. We used data from three scanner vendors (over more than five scanners) and from both cognitively normal (CN) adult and patients cohorts [with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD)].ResultsAn analysis of WMH segmentation performance across both scanner and clinical stage (CN, MCI, AD) factors was conducted. We compared our results to both conventional and transfer-learning deep learning methods and observed better generalization with M3SL across different datasets. We evaluated several metrics (F-measure, IoU, and Hausdorff distance) and found significant improvements with our method compared to conventional (p < 0.001) and transfer-learning (p < 0.001).DiscussionThese findings suggest that automated, non-machine learning, tools have a role in a multi-stage learning framework and can reduce the impact of limited annotated data and, thus, enhance model performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.