2019
DOI: 10.1515/jisys-2017-0520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Based Part-of-Speech Tagging for Malayalam Twitter Data (Special Issue: Deep Learning Techniques for Natural Language Processing)

Abstract: The paper addresses the problem of part-of-speech (POS) tagging for Malayalam tweets. The conversational style of posts/tweets/text in social media data poses a challenge in using general POS tagset for tagging the text. For the current work, a tagset was designed that contains 17 coarse tags and 9915 tweets were tagged manually for experiment and evaluation. The tagged data were evaluated using sequential deep learning methods like recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent units (GRU), long short-term m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section describes the most commonly deployed performance metrics for validating the performance of ML and DL methods for POS tagging. All the evaluation metrics are based on the different metrics used in the Confusion Matrix, which is a confusion matrix providing information about the Actual and Predicted class which are; True Positive (TP)-assigns correct tags to the given words, false positive (FP)-assigns incorrect tags to the given words, false negative (FN)-not assign any tags to given words [14,55,72].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section describes the most commonly deployed performance metrics for validating the performance of ML and DL methods for POS tagging. All the evaluation metrics are based on the different metrics used in the Confusion Matrix, which is a confusion matrix providing information about the Actual and Predicted class which are; True Positive (TP)-assigns correct tags to the given words, false positive (FP)-assigns incorrect tags to the given words, false negative (FN)-not assign any tags to given words [14,55,72].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenge is the disambiguation of word senses by the machine. A wide range of language processing systems is pre-processing using prosedur operasional standar (POS) tagging [17], which greatly increases their accuracy and recall. Applications to speech recognition and analysis, data gathering, and some other NLP tasks are mostly found in the POS tagged (annotated) language corpora.…”
Section:  Issn: 2502-4752mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has featured in a limited number of NLP tasks, including morphological analysis (Bhavukam et al, 2018), POS tagging (Akhil et al, 2020) and NER (Ajees and Idicula, 2018). However, many studies use small locally generated data sets (Nambiar et al, 2019) or domain specific data sets (Kumar et al, 2019), (Devi et al, 2016), which usually are not freely available.…”
Section: Malayalammentioning
confidence: 99%