2021
DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-co-834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based video stream reconstruction in mass-production diffractive optical systems

Abstract: Many recent studies have focused on developing image reconstruction algorithms in optical systems based on flat optics. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of applying a combination of flat optics and the reconstruction algorithms in real vision systems. However, additional causes of quality loss have been encountered in the development of such systems. This study investigates the influence on the reconstructed image quality of such factors as limitations of mass production technology for diffractive opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these methods are based on the known image degradation models and range from simple downsampling with a bicubic upsampling [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] to more recent works, relying on blurring kernel degradation [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. When applied to real-world images, these algorithms suffer from artifacts because the real image degradation is usually too complex [ 33 ] or has a non-local behavior that depends on the image content [ 16 , 34 ]. Artifact-free results can still be achieved with techniques described in [ 33 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most of these methods are based on the known image degradation models and range from simple downsampling with a bicubic upsampling [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] to more recent works, relying on blurring kernel degradation [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. When applied to real-world images, these algorithms suffer from artifacts because the real image degradation is usually too complex [ 33 ] or has a non-local behavior that depends on the image content [ 16 , 34 ]. Artifact-free results can still be achieved with techniques described in [ 33 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To build a semi-real dataset for supervised learning, we use a capture-from-screen laboratory setup [ 16 ] with a laptop connected to a UHD LCD monitor and Basler acA1920-40uc USB 3.0 camera with our doublet lens system. However, this setup has three main differences from real scene capturing: a higher dynamic range, camera gain, and lossy video compression.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Papers [ 12 , 13 ] consider model-based and DSP-based fault prediction, while papers [ 14 , 15 ] and more recent ones use data-driven approaches. Data-driven and deep learning-based methods show great results not only in computer vision applications [ 16 , 17 ], speech recognition [ 18 ], natural language processing [ 19 ], and medical imaging [ 20 , 21 ], but also as classifiers for induction motor fault classification [ 22 ], railway vehicle wheels diagnosis [ 23 ], industrial machinery [ 24 ], hydraulic system malfunction identification [ 25 ], and fault diagnosis of aircraft engines [ 26 ]. A comprehensive review of intelligent fault diagnostic methods presented as a single timeline is provided in [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%