2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning enabled brain shunt valve identification using mobile phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that a larger kernel of AlexNet (7 × 7) performs more efficiently on this task, which was deployed on smartphones for convenient and efficient application. 81,82 An LoD of 10 aM was achieved with the optimized RPA primers, crRNA, and SPM, which was comparable to the detection sensitivity of qPCR. FV3 DNA can be detected by PCR in the liver at 4 days postinfection (dpi) and in most organs at 14 dpi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results indicated that a larger kernel of AlexNet (7 × 7) performs more efficiently on this task, which was deployed on smartphones for convenient and efficient application. 81,82 An LoD of 10 aM was achieved with the optimized RPA primers, crRNA, and SPM, which was comparable to the detection sensitivity of qPCR. FV3 DNA can be detected by PCR in the liver at 4 days postinfection (dpi) and in most organs at 14 dpi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this was the first time that fluorescence images from RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a, captured by SPM, were used to calculate the concentration of pathogenic DNA with deep learning. ,, Three deep learning models based on transfer learning performed well on this task, and classification using fluorescence images did not require tiny features. The results indicated that a larger kernel of AlexNet (7 × 7) performs more efficiently on this task, which was deployed on smartphones for convenient and efficient application. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, a previous study using a similar deep learning approach with transfer learning achieved a 96% accuracy in identifying five shunt valve types [ 6 ]. Another study reported a detection accuracy of 95% in identifying three shunt valve types using a model trained on smartphone images of X-rays [ 20 ]. Therefore, our study presents a more extensive and accurate deep learning model, both in terms of identification accuracy and the range of identifiable shunt valve types, surpassing the results of the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that a larger kernel of AlexNet (7×7) is more efficient on this task. In addition, to further optimize the detection system, we can deploy deep learning models on smartphones and get the result more conveniently and efficiently (Alkhulaifi et al 2021; Sujit et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%