2019
DOI: 10.1101/617860
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning enables therapeutic antibody optimization in mammalian cells by deciphering high-dimensional protein sequence space

Abstract: 150 words) 13 Therapeutic antibody optimization is time and resource intensive, largely because it requires 14 low-throughput screening (10 3 variants) of full-length IgG in mammalian cells, typically resulting 15 in only a few optimized leads. Here, we use deep learning to interrogate and predict antigen-16 specificity from a massively diverse sequence space to identify globally optimized antibody 17 variants. Using a mammalian display platform and the therapeutic antibody trastuzumab, 18 rationally designed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of developable hits of such libraries may be increased by tuning sequence diversity towards the interaction motifs (and their corresponding sequential bias) here discovered. Relatedly, engineering-driven computational optimization of antibody-antigen binding as well as docking algorithms might benefit from incorporating interaction-motif-based heuristics (Baran et al, 2017;Krawczyk et al, 2013;Kuroda and Gray, 2016;Mason et al, 2019;Sivasubramanian et al, 2009;Weitzner and Gray, 2016). Specifically, if we assume that the interaction motif sequential dependencies discovered here were evolutionarily optimized, they may be used to substitute for the lack of available multiple alignments that are used to calculate high-propensity interacting residues in protein-protein docking (Krawczyk et al, 2013).…”
Section: Implications For Antibody Discovery and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of developable hits of such libraries may be increased by tuning sequence diversity towards the interaction motifs (and their corresponding sequential bias) here discovered. Relatedly, engineering-driven computational optimization of antibody-antigen binding as well as docking algorithms might benefit from incorporating interaction-motif-based heuristics (Baran et al, 2017;Krawczyk et al, 2013;Kuroda and Gray, 2016;Mason et al, 2019;Sivasubramanian et al, 2009;Weitzner and Gray, 2016). Specifically, if we assume that the interaction motif sequential dependencies discovered here were evolutionarily optimized, they may be used to substitute for the lack of available multiple alignments that are used to calculate high-propensity interacting residues in protein-protein docking (Krawczyk et al, 2013).…”
Section: Implications For Antibody Discovery and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the future, it may also be of interest to correlate interaction motifs with antibody developability parameters (Jain et al, 2017;Lecerf et al, 2019;Mason et al, 2019;Raybould et al, 2019b). Antibody developability depends on a multitude of parameters that are calculated based on the entire antibody complex (Andersen et al, 2011;Raybould et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Implications For Antibody Discovery and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deep learning offers one route to better capture the complex relationships between sequence and protein behavior and has been the focus of many recent publications. [38][39][40][41][42] Within the context of discovery and libraries, the generative models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) 43,44 and autoencoder networks (AEs) 45 are of particular interest as they have been shown to be viable for generating unique sequences of proteins 46,47 and nanobodies 48 and antibody CDRs 49 . But these efforts focus on short sequences of proteins or portions of antibodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]). Some of these techniques require a large number of known binders to a given epitope, to be able to identify further binders [9]. The informatics approaches employed to analyse datasets, when none or only a few binders to a given epitope are known, are mainly dependent on sequence similarity, based on the concept of "clonotype" analysis [8], which considers the genotype and the sequence identity of CDRH3 (the third complementarity determining region on the heavy chain) [8,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%