2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022jd038163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Downscaling Tropical Cyclone Rainfall to Hazard‐Relevant Spatial Scales

Abstract: Flooding, driven in part by intense rainfall, is the leading cause of mortality and damages from the most intense tropical cyclones (TCs). With rainfall from TCs set to increase under anthropogenic climate change, it is critical to accurately estimate extreme rainfall to better support short‐term and long‐term resilience efforts. While high‐resolution climate models capture TC statistics better than low‐resolution models, they are computationally expensive. This leads to a trade‐off between capturing TC featur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely used in many super-resolution and downscaling studies (i.e. Harris et al, 2022;Leinonen et al, 2021;Vosper et al, 2023). Note we use the MSE loss function as opposed to the MAE loss as it is more sensitive to errors in extreme events (not shown).…”
Section: Generator Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is widely used in many super-resolution and downscaling studies (i.e. Harris et al, 2022;Leinonen et al, 2021;Vosper et al, 2023). Note we use the MSE loss function as opposed to the MAE loss as it is more sensitive to errors in extreme events (not shown).…”
Section: Generator Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note we use the MSE loss function as opposed to the MAE loss as it is more sensitive to errors in extreme events (not shown). It is important to note that training with an 𝜆 𝑎𝑑𝑣 too large is often unstable (Isola et al, 2018;Vosper et al, 2023), and the majority of existing studies generally use values of 𝜆 𝑎𝑑𝑣 less than 0.005 (Harris et al, 2022;Izumi et al, 2022;Leinonen et al, 2021;Vosper et al, 2023;X. Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Generator Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations