2021
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning for Malignancy Risk Estimation of Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Low-Dose Screening CT

Abstract: Dutch-Belgian Lung Cancer Screening trial showed that screening high-risk individuals with low-dose chest CT reduced lung cancer mortality by 20% and 26%, respectively (1,2). This is linked to a beneficial stage shift, with stage I and II lung cancer having a much better prognosis than stage III or IV lung cancer (3). Lung cancer typically manifests as pulmonary nodules at CT. However, most nodules are benign and do not require further clinical workup. Nodule management guidelines and data-driven models have b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among human–machine comparisons, many studies have reported that CNN diagnosis is on par with human visual assessment in multiple areas [ 17 ]. For example, for malignancy risk estimation of pulmonary nodules using thoracic CT, Venkadesh et al [ 18 ] reported that the DL algorithm had an AUC of 0.96, which was significantly better than the average AUC of the clinicians (0.90) but comparable to that of thoracic radiologists. Our model was able to discriminate between AL and TTR CA with interesting values of patient-based accuracy (0.711) and AUC (0.752); however, this was no better than the classification obtained with the simple measurement of the septal thickness, already reported in previous publications [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] and resulting from the known increased amyloid burden in this subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among human–machine comparisons, many studies have reported that CNN diagnosis is on par with human visual assessment in multiple areas [ 17 ]. For example, for malignancy risk estimation of pulmonary nodules using thoracic CT, Venkadesh et al [ 18 ] reported that the DL algorithm had an AUC of 0.96, which was significantly better than the average AUC of the clinicians (0.90) but comparable to that of thoracic radiologists. Our model was able to discriminate between AL and TTR CA with interesting values of patient-based accuracy (0.711) and AUC (0.752); however, this was no better than the classification obtained with the simple measurement of the septal thickness, already reported in previous publications [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] and resulting from the known increased amyloid burden in this subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using only image voxels, deep learning algorithms were reported to show better performance than logistic regression-based methods. 48 49…”
Section: Malignancy Risk Estimation Of Lung Nodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a complementary way, deep learning has already been used for the differential diagnosis of liver lesions [ 72 , 73 ], the detection of malignant lung nodules [ 74 , 75 ], the detection and classification of breast masses [ 76 ], and the assessment of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer [ 77 ]. The methodology described before can be applied to multiple lesional imaging criteria.…”
Section: Application and Evidence For Novel Imaging Biomarkers For Im...mentioning
confidence: 99%