2021
DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0564.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning for multidimensional seismic impedance inversion

Abstract: Deep learning methods have shown promising performances in predicting acoustic impedance from seismic data which is typically considered as an ill-posed problem for traditional inver- sion schemes. Most of the deep learning methods, however, are based on a 1D neural network which is straightforward to implement but often yields unreasonable lateral discontinuities while predicting a multi-dimensional impedance model trace-by-trace. We introduce an improvement over the 1D network by replacing it with a 2D convo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lateral discontinuity is a common problem in current data-driven inversion. Wu solves this problem using a multidimensional inversion approach [11], which uses a 2D neural network to learn 1D labels and sets the weight of unlabeled regions to 0. Learning using sparse labels was first proposed in 3D UNet and used in 3D medical image segmentation [33], later applied to geophysical fields such as inversion and fault detection [5], [6], [11].…”
Section: A Semi-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lateral discontinuity is a common problem in current data-driven inversion. Wu solves this problem using a multidimensional inversion approach [11], which uses a 2D neural network to learn 1D labels and sets the weight of unlabeled regions to 0. Learning using sparse labels was first proposed in 3D UNet and used in 3D medical image segmentation [33], later applied to geophysical fields such as inversion and fault detection [5], [6], [11].…”
Section: A Semi-supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, 7) still requires 34 logging labels, and its predictions have significant discontinuities in the horizontal direction, the same drawback is also reflected in other semi-supervised impedance inversion methods [30]- [32]. The discontinuity in the horizontal direction is due to the fact that these methods try to match the dimensionality of the logs by downscaling the 3D or 2D seismic data, which is avoided by the multidimensional inversion proposed by Wu et al [11], the idea of this method originates from medical image segmentation [33], where the model is trained using labels of the same dimensionality as the seismic and the weights of the unlabeled regions are set to zero. The method achieved a significant performance improvement with the use of 40 logs in SEAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional methods, deep learning does not require manually defined criteria and automatically picks up the deep-level information of images. Deep learning has been successfully employed for data processing and interpretation in seismic exploration, for example, seismic data noise attenuation [30] [31] [32] [33], first-arrival picking [34] [35] [36], velocity model building [37] [38] [39], impedance inversion [40] [41], and seismic structural interpretation [42] [43] [44]. Although, a few advances in deep learning have been reported for simultaneous-source data deblending [45] [46] [47], few studies have used deep learning for image denoising in multi-source seismic migration.…”
Section: Startmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion method based on trace by trace does not exploit the spatial correlation in the horizontal direction, which may lead to poor horizontal continuity of inversion results. To improve the continuity, Wu et al (2021) proposed a 2D network-based inversion method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%