“…Other studies analyzed and evaluated the performance of popular semantic segmentation methods named DeepLabv3+, Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), and ENet on problems related to natural disaster datasets [27], detecting and segmenting important objects in aerial footage of disaster locations used Mask-Region Based Convolutional Neural Networks (Mask-RCNN) and PSPNet [28], segmentation of damage to buildings after a natural disaster used MSNet [29], a self-attention-based semantic segmentation named ReDNet on a disaster UAV dataset and compared with three other advanced segmentation models: ENet, DeepLabv3+, and PSPNet [30], flood detection based on CNN AlexNet to extract flood-related features from disaster zone images [31], semantic segmentation of aerial images for post-flood landscape understanding by applying three advanced semantic segmentation networks namely ENet, PSPNet, and DeepLabv3+ [32], detecting buildings damaged after an earthquake used a network model Convolutional neural network VGG-16, VGG-19, and NASNet [33], semantic segmentation of natural disaster datasets used self-attentionbased methods combined with Global Average Pooling and U-Net [34], semantic segmentation of post-flood datasets with U-Net, PSPNet, and DeepLabV3+ [35], detecting flooding used segmentation with three deep neural networks: PSPNet, DeepLabV3, and U-Net [36], and extracted residential buildings with a modified Mask R-CNN [37], semantic segmentation of volcanic ash eruptions used SegNet and U-Net convolutional neural networks for volcano monitoring in volcanic eruptions [38], landslide detection and identification used Lightweight Attention U-Net [39], finding buildings damaged by disasters used transfers-learning deep attention network (TDA-Net) [40], and semantic segmentation to detect landslides used U-Net [41], [42], and self-training method [43].…”