2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning for temporal data representation in electronic health records: A systematic review of challenges and methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 provides a brief description of the main methods discussed in this paper, and the reader is referred to other more detailed literature for detailed merits and demerits of each method. [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]…”
Section: The Way Machine Learning Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 provides a brief description of the main methods discussed in this paper, and the reader is referred to other more detailed literature for detailed merits and demerits of each method. [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]…”
Section: The Way Machine Learning Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSTM models, a gated variant of RNN, can keep long-term memory by remembering long sequences of data since. Existing works were focused on the use of DL for the temporal data representation in EHR, facing various challenges, such as the data irregularity and data heterogeneity [11]. Mainly, RNN, LSTM and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) have been proposed for their suitability in representing temporal sequences.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Recently, a lightweight DL framework was developed by using a large-scale dataset of 28 581 cases.Superior accuracy with an average Dice of 0.95 was achieved on 67 delineation tasks and real-time delineation in whole-body organs at risk (OARs) and tumors was less than 2 s. 8 Despite the great promise of this technique, it is still necessary to evaluate its geometric accuracy before implementing it in clinical applications. [9][10][11] Generally, two main categories of evaluation metrics (region-based and boundary-based) were used for assessment of the goodness and usefulness of automatic delineation. 12 The commonly used region-based metrics compare the region overlap between autosegmentation contours and their corresponding ground truth, such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) 13 and Jaccard index (JI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%