2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning for wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in a systematic review and meta-analysis, Soffer et al analyzed 10 studies that provided sufficient data for a quantitative meta-analysis of the CNN technique. 34 The pooled sensitivity and specificity for ulcer detection were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for bleeding or the bleeding source were 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. However, there was high heterogeneity between studies and most studies had a high risk of bias.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in a systematic review and meta-analysis, Soffer et al analyzed 10 studies that provided sufficient data for a quantitative meta-analysis of the CNN technique. 34 The pooled sensitivity and specificity for ulcer detection were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for bleeding or the bleeding source were 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. However, there was high heterogeneity between studies and most studies had a high risk of bias.…”
Section: Application Of Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, the CNN model significantly reduced the reading time compared with conventional reading by endoscopists (5.9 min vs. 96.6 min), thus showing the outstanding effectiveness of CNN models. Finally, in a systematic review and meta-analysis, Soffer et al analyzed 10 studies that provided sufficient data for a quantitative meta-analysis of the CNN technique [ 34 ]. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for ulcer detection were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for bleeding or the bleeding source were 0.98 and 0.99, respectively.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence In Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI can be a perfect assistant in analyzing this high‐volume data and highlight the suspicious regions. Soffer et al 42 . investigated 19 retrospective studies and showed DL has been widely adopted for wireless capsule endoscopy applications including detection of ulcers, polyps, celiac disease, bleeding, and hookworm with detection accuracy above 90% for most studies.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Image Analysis In Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clinical evidence of deep learning algorithms is still poor (there are few studies with low confidence), they show equivalent (or even better) performance than clinicians [9,10]. In this sense, some systematic reviews show the potential of deep learning in gastric tissue diseases [11] and wireless endoscopic capsule [12], but these studies also identify risk of bias due to gaps in the evaluation metrics and public availability of the dataset [11] that must be solved through prospective multicenter studies [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%