2022
DOI: 10.5755/j02.eie.31133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning in Analysing Paranasal Sinuses

Abstract: Deep neural network-based diagnostic tools have gained state-of-the-art performance in the medical field in recent years. Diagnostic accuracy has become very critical for medical treatments. This paper proposes a simple and novel deep learning-based system for the analysis of paranasal sinuses conditions. In this work, we focus on analysing the paranasal sinuses on CT images automatically, providing physicians with high-accuracy diagnosis. The proposed system enables one to reduce the number of images to be se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present a CAD system employing CNN to classify MS opacifications and compare them with clinical data. While studies have explored prevalence of MS opacifications, [7][8][9][10][11] they have not been integrated into the broader context of correlating with clinical data using CAD. Our approach offers a less labor-intensive solution for detecting and classifying MS opacifications, leveraging one of the largest datasets available for studying paranasal incidental findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We present a CAD system employing CNN to classify MS opacifications and compare them with clinical data. While studies have explored prevalence of MS opacifications, [7][8][9][10][11] they have not been integrated into the broader context of correlating with clinical data using CAD. Our approach offers a less labor-intensive solution for detecting and classifying MS opacifications, leveraging one of the largest datasets available for studying paranasal incidental findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study cropped x-ray images to classify anomalies 7 but failed to distinguish between left and right maxillary sinus anomalies. Another study segmented CT images and classified anomalies, 8 demanding pixel-level annotations for localization. Alternatively, a different approach used a CNN to detect key slices within CT images containing maxillary sinus volumes and subsequently classify maxillary sinus anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 . Previous approaches [ 18 ] used a 2-stage CNN pipeline, learning key MS slices first using a CNN and then classifying anomalies with another CNN [ 18 ] or learning to segment the maxillary sinus and then classifying the anomaly [ 17 ], but these methods 2 stage CNN pipeline makes it dependent on datasets hindering generalization. To overcome this limitation, we propose a method that extracts multiple MS volumes without DL, using a CNN only once to compute the final anomaly score for each MS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one study cropped X-rays and classified anomalies [ 16 ], but failed to classify left and right MS anomalies separately. Another study segmented Computed Tomography (CT) images and classified anomalies [ 17 ], necessitating pixel-level annotations for localization. A different approach involved using a CNN to detect key slices in CT images containing MS volumes and then classifying MS anomalies [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%